Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:76
作者
Zhou, Shan [1 ]
Yang, Pu [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Distributed wind energy; Risk management; PEST analysis; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Quantitative risk analysis; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; REAL OPTIONS; GENERATION; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION; MULTIPLE; PROJECTS; BENEFITS; ONSHORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Distributed wind power has received growing attention in recent years. However, high risks remain in its investigation, which severely hindered its development. This study attempts to gather and identify risk factors in distributed wind power through literature reviews and rank the risks based on expert opinions. Based on previous literature, we classified risk for distributed wind power investment into four types, namely the political risks, economic risks, social risks, and technical risks. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used to assess risks in the life cycle of the distributed wind farm. Political, Economic, Social and Technical methodology as the criteria hierarchy is introduced to classify the identified risks as the sub-criteria hierarchy in the AHP model. The result shows that the risk of changes in electricity price policy is the most critical impact on the distributed wind power system to obtain sustainable development and make profits. Therefore, the government needs to provide a long-term vision of electricity price policy to promote the development of distributed wind projects. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Incorporating Maritime Stakeholder Perspectives for Implementing an 'InlandDepots- for-Empty-Containers' System Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Mittal, Neha ;
Boile, Maria ;
Baveja, Alok ;
Theofanis, Sotiris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 6 (01) :1-23
[42]   Analysis of landslide risk based on fuzzy extension analytic hierarchy process [J].
Yang, Weifeng ;
Zheng, Zhihong ;
Zhang, Xinquan ;
Tan, Baohua ;
Li, Luyao .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (04) :2523-2531
[43]   Analytic Hierarchy Process to Improve the Evaluation Process in R&D Management System [J].
Bueno, Tania C. D. ;
Donatti, Fabricio T. ;
Oliveira, Thiago P. S. ;
Zotti, Angela I. ;
Hoeschl, Hugo C. .
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS, BIS 2013, 2013, 160 :15-22
[44]   Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in drought management: case study of Gorganrood basin, Iran [J].
Hosseini-Moghari, Seyed-Mohammad ;
Araghinejad, Shahab ;
Azarnivand, Ali .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2017, 66 (03) :207-218
[45]   Use of swot and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management [J].
Yavuz, Fadim ;
Baycan, Tuzin .
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT (HAICTA 2013), 2013, 8 :134-143
[46]   A model for supply chain risk management in the automotive industry using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Heidari, Samira Salehi ;
Khanbabaei, Mohammad ;
Sabzehparvar, Majid .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (09) :3831-3857
[47]   The Research on the Risk Management of PPP Projects in "One Belt, One Road" Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Song Wei ;
Pan Guangchuan .
INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND STRATEGY IN THE ERA OF INTERNET, 2016, :781-788
[48]   Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications [J].
Vaidya, OS ;
Kumar, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) :1-29
[49]   Analytic Hierarchy Process for website evaluation [J].
Kabassi, Katerina .
INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2018, 12 (02) :137-148
[50]   On the analytic hierarchy process with conflicting criteria [J].
Mazurek, Jiri ;
Kiszova, Zuzana .
MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2013, PTS I AND II, 2013, :600-605