Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:74
作者
Zhou, Shan [1 ]
Yang, Pu [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Distributed wind energy; Risk management; PEST analysis; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Quantitative risk analysis; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; REAL OPTIONS; GENERATION; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION; MULTIPLE; PROJECTS; BENEFITS; ONSHORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Distributed wind power has received growing attention in recent years. However, high risks remain in its investigation, which severely hindered its development. This study attempts to gather and identify risk factors in distributed wind power through literature reviews and rank the risks based on expert opinions. Based on previous literature, we classified risk for distributed wind power investment into four types, namely the political risks, economic risks, social risks, and technical risks. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used to assess risks in the life cycle of the distributed wind farm. Political, Economic, Social and Technical methodology as the criteria hierarchy is introduced to classify the identified risks as the sub-criteria hierarchy in the AHP model. The result shows that the risk of changes in electricity price policy is the most critical impact on the distributed wind power system to obtain sustainable development and make profits. Therefore, the government needs to provide a long-term vision of electricity price policy to promote the development of distributed wind projects. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Work Better Than Analytic Hierarchy Process? [J].
Xiaofeng Chen ;
Yanting Fang ;
Junyi Chai ;
Zeshui Xu .
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2022, 24 :909-924
[32]   Does Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Work Better Than Analytic Hierarchy Process? [J].
Chen, Xiaofeng ;
Fang, Yanting ;
Chai, Junyi ;
Xu, Zeshui .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 24 (02) :909-924
[33]   Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach [J].
Kablan, MM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (10) :1151-1158
[34]   A systematic approach for assessment of renewable energy using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Gerçek Budak ;
Xin Chen ;
Serdar Celik ;
Berk Ozturk .
Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9
[35]   A systematic approach for assessment of renewable energy using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Budak, Gercek ;
Chen, Xin ;
Celik, Serdar ;
Ozturk, Berk .
ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 9 (01)
[36]   XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector [J].
Hocine, Amine ;
Kouaissah, Noureddine .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 97
[37]   The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Prospects for Application in Supply Chain Management [J].
Lukinskiy, Valery ;
Lukinskiy, Vladislav .
RELIABILITY AND STATISTICS IN TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION, 2018, 36 :284-289
[38]   A Risk Assessment Framework for Critical Infrastructure Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Fioravanti, C. ;
Guarino, S. ;
Mazza, B. ;
Nobili, M. ;
Santucci, F. ;
Ansaldi, S. M. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (40) :277-282
[39]   Navigational Environmental Risk Evaluation of Breakwater Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Chen Chunhui ;
Jiao Zhanli ;
Jiang Fucai .
MATERIALS, TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 779-780 :1648-+
[40]   Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method of Building Engineering Design Risk [J].
Su Yongqiang .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 CHINESE SEMINAR ON THE PRINCIPLES OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, :222-225