A software tool for measurement of the modulation transfer function

被引:6
作者
Kao, YH [1 ]
Albert, M [1 ]
Carton, AK [1 ]
Bosmans, H [1 ]
Maidment, ADA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1 and 2 | 2005年 / 5745卷
关键词
modulation transfer function (MTF); edge spread function (ESF); line spread function (LSF); edge slope estimation;
D O I
10.1117/12.597323
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Calculation of the modulation transfer function (MTF) is a multi-step procedure. At each step in the calculation, the algorithms can have intrinsic errors which are independent of the imaging system or physics. We designed a software tool with a graphical user interface to facilitate calculation of MTF and the analysis of accuracy in those calculations. To minimize the source of errors, simulated edge images without any noise or artifacts were used. We first examined the accuracy of a commonly used edge-slope estimation algorithm; namely line-by-line differentiation followed by a linear regression fit. The influence of edge length and edge phase on the linear regression algorithm is demonstrated. Furthermore, the relationship of edge-slope estimation error and MTF error are illustrated. We compared the performance of two kernels, [-1,1] and [-1,0,1], in the computation of the line spread function (LSF) from finite element differentiation of the edge spread function (ESF). We found that there is no practical advantage in choosing the [-1,0,1] kernel, as recommended by IEC. However, a correction for finite element differentiation should be applied; otherwise, there is a measurable error in the MTF. Finally, we added noise into the edge images and compared the performance of two noise reduction methods on the ESF; convolution with a boxcar kernel and a monotonicity constraint. The former method always produces MTF error higher than 4% up to the sampling frequency, while the latter was consistently less than 1%.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1208
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image [J].
Buhr, E ;
Günther-Kohfahl, S ;
Neitzel, U .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2323-2331
[2]  
CARTON AK, 2005, IN PRESS MED PHYS
[3]  
CARTON AK, 2004, DEV APPL METHODS ASS, V149
[4]   A METHOD FOR MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION DETERMINATION FROM EDGE PROFILES WITH CORRECTION FOR FINITE-ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
CUNNINGHAM, IA ;
FENSTER, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) :533-537
[5]  
FRIGO M, 1997, MITLCSTR, V728
[6]   A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
FUJITA, H ;
TSAI, DY ;
ITOH, T ;
DOI, K ;
MORISHITA, J ;
UEDA, K ;
OHTSUKA, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1992, 11 (01) :34-39
[7]   Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method [J].
Greer, PB ;
van Doorn, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (09) :2048-2059
[8]  
IEC, 2003, 622201 IEC
[9]  
JUDY P F, 1976, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V3, P233, DOI 10.1118/1.594283
[10]   Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function [J].
Maidment, ADA ;
Albert, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (02) :248-253