Diagnostic performance and image quality of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on unenhanced low-dose abdominal CT for urolithiasis

被引:11
作者
Delabie, Aurelien [1 ]
Bouzerar, Roger [2 ]
Pichois, Raphael [1 ]
Desdoit, Xavier [1 ]
Vial, Jeremie [1 ]
Renard, Cedric [1 ]
机构
[1] Amiens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 1 Rond Point Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens 01, France
[2] Amiens Univ Hosp, Med Image Proc Unit, Amiens, France
关键词
Urolithiasis; computed tomography; image enhancement; deep learning; image reconstruction; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER-RISKS; RADIATION; REDUCTION; TOMOGRAPHY; IMPACT; CHEST;
D O I
10.1177/02841851211035896
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Patients with urolithiasis undergo radiation overexposure from computed tomography (CT) scans. Improvement of image reconstruction is necessary for radiation dose reduction. Purpose To evaluate a deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm for CT (DLIR) in the detection of urolithiasis at low-dose non-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Material and Methods A total of 75 patients who underwent low-dose abdominopelvic CT for urolithiasis were retrospectively included. Each examination included three reconstructions: DLIR; filtered back projection (FBP); and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR; ASiR-V 70%). Image quality was subjectively and objectively assessed using attenuation and noise measurements in order to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), absolute contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Attenuation of the largest stones were also compared. Detectability of urinary stones was assessed by two observers. Results Image noise was significantly reduced with DLIR: 7.2 versus 17 and 22 for ASiR-V 70% and FBP, respectively. Similarly, SNR and CNR were also higher compared to the standard reconstructions. When the structures had close attenuation values, contrast was lower with DLIR compared to ASiR-V. Attenuation of stones was also lowered in the DLIR series. Subjective image quality was significantly higher with DLIR. The detectability of all stones and stones >3 mm was excellent with DLIR for the two observers (intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.93 vs. 0.96 and 0.95 vs. 0.99). For smaller stones (<3 mm), results were different (ICC = 0.77 vs. 0.86). Conclusion For low-dose abdominopelvic CT, DLIR reconstruction exhibited image quality superior to ASiR-V and FBP as well as an excellent detection of urinary stones.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1292
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Low-Dose CT With Automatic Tube Current Modulation, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Low Tube Voltage for the Diagnosis of Renal Colic: Impact of Body Mass Index [J].
Gervaise, Alban ;
Naulet, Pierre ;
Beuret, Florence ;
Henry, Christelle ;
Pernin, Matthieu ;
Portron, Yann ;
Lapierre-Combes, Marie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) :553-560
[12]   State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques [J].
Geyer, Lucas L. ;
Schoepf, U. Joseph ;
Meinel, Felix G. ;
Nance, John W., Jr. ;
Bastarrika, Gorka ;
Leipsic, Jonathon A. ;
Paul, Narinder S. ;
Rengo, Marco ;
Laghi, Andrea ;
De Cecco, Carlo N. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) :338-356
[13]   Assessment of 1 mSv Urinary Tract Stone CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction [J].
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Maturen, Katherine E. ;
Cohan, Richard H. ;
Davenport, Matthew S. ;
Ellis, James H. ;
Knoepp, Ursula S. ;
Weadock, William J. ;
Platt, Joel F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (06) :1230-1235
[14]   Dose reduction with iterative reconstruction: Optimization of CT protocols in clinical practice [J].
Greffier, J. ;
Macri, F. ;
Larbi, A. ;
Fernandez, A. ;
Khasanova, E. ;
Pereira, F. ;
Mekkaoui, C. ;
Beregi, J. P. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2015, 96 (05) :477-486
[15]   Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study [J].
Greffier, Joel ;
Hamard, Aymeric ;
Pereira, Fabricio ;
Barrau, Corinne ;
Pasquier, Hugo ;
Beregi, Jean Paul ;
Frandon, Julien .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) :3951-3959
[16]   Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data [J].
Hall, E. J. ;
Brenner, D. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1020) :E1316-E1317
[17]   Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics [J].
Higaki, Toru ;
Nakamura, Yuko ;
Zhou, Jian ;
Yu, Zhou ;
Nemoto, Takuya ;
Tatsugami, Fuminari ;
Awai, Kazuo .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) :82-87
[18]   CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction [J].
Hur, Joonho ;
Park, Sung Bin ;
Lee, Jong Beum ;
Park, Hyun Jeong ;
Chang, In Ho ;
Kwon, Jong Kyou ;
Kim, Yang Soo .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (07) :2432-2440
[19]   Image Quality Assessment of Abdominal CT by Use of New Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: Initial Experience [J].
Jensen, Corey T. ;
Liu, Xinming ;
Tamm, Eric P. ;
Chandler, Adam G. ;
Sun, Jia ;
Morani, Ajaykumar C. ;
Javadi, Sanaz ;
Wagner-Bartak, Nicolaus A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (01) :50-57
[20]   Imaging for urolithiasis: standards, trends, and radiation exposure [J].
Lipkin, Michael ;
Ackerman, Anika .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) :56-62