Responsiveness of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients

被引：66

作者：

SooHoo, Nelson F. ^{[1
]}

Li, Zhongmin ^{[2
]}

Chenok, Kate E. ^{[3
]}

Bozic, Kevin J. ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA

[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA

[3] Pacific Business Grp Hlth, San Francisco, CA USA

[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA

[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2015年 / 30卷 / 02期

关键词：

total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; patient reported outcome measures; registry; functional outcomes; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.026

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study reports the responsiveness to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of three patient reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively for 391 patients enrolled in the California Joint Replacement Registry. Effect size, standardized response means, and MCID were calculated for each measure. The WOMAC and the SF12v2 physical component summary (PCS) score were the most responsive to perioperative changes. The MCID was 4.97 for the SF12v2 PCS and 10.21 for the WOMAC. THA patients were more likely to exhibit improvements above the MCID than TKA patients. The WOMAC and SF12v2 PCS are useful to measure health status changes in TJA patients. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：176 / 191

页数：16

共 11 条

[1] [Anonymous], INP SURG
[2] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, TECHN EXP PAN TEP NO
[3] The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty
Clement, N. D.
MacDonald, D.
Simpson, A. H. R. W.
[J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (08) : 1933 - 1939
[4] Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability
Finch, E
Walsh, M
Thomas, SG
Woodhouse, LJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 27 (04) : 255 - 263
[5] Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Registries: Challenges and Opportunities
Franklin, Patricia D.
Harrold, Leslie
Ayers, David C.
[J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (11) : 3482 - 3488
[6] Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee - Decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes
Hamel, Mary Beth
Toth, Maria
Legedza, Anna
Rosen, Max P.
[J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (13) : 1430 - 1440
[7] EFFECT SIZES FOR INTERPRETING CHANGES IN HEALTH-STATUS
KAZIS, LE
ANDERSON, JJ
MEENAN, RF
[J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) : S178 - S189
[8] How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?
Middel, B
Stewart, R
Bouma, J
van Sonderen, E
van den Heuvel, WJA
[J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (04) : 399 - 410
[9] Which is the Best Activity Rating Scale for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Naal, Florian D.
Impellizzeri, Franco M.
Leunig, Michael
[J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (04) : 958 - 965
[10] Barriers to Completion of Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Schamber, Elizabeth M.
Takemoto, Steven K.
Chenok, Kate Eresian
Bozic, Kevin J.
[J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (09) : 1449 - 1453

← 1 2 →