Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

被引:22
|
作者
Zhu, Mary P. [1 ]
Tetreault, Lindsay A. [2 ,3 ]
Sorefan-Mangou, Fatimah [3 ]
Garwood, Philip [3 ]
Wilson, Jefferson R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Med, Grad Entry Med, Coll Rd, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2018年 / 18卷 / 09期
关键词
Complications; Outcomes; Postoperative bracing; Spinal pathology; Surgery; Systematic review; ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS; DEGENERATIVE CONDITIONS; FUSION; COLLAR; TRIAL; MOTION; INDIVIDUALS; DISKECTOMY; INTERBODY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bracing is often used after spinal surgery to immobilize the spine, improve fusion, and relieve pain. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy, necessity, and safety of various bracing techniques in the postsurgical setting. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of postoperative bracing versus no postoperative bracing after spinal surgery in patients with several common operative spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Asystematic review was carried out to compare postoperative bracing and no postoperative bracing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from 1970 to May 2017, supplemented by manual searching of the reference list of relevant studies and previously published reviews. Studies were included if they compared disability, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, or complications between patients treated with postoperative bracing and patients not receiving any postoperative bracing. Each article was critically appraised independently by two reviewers, and the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. RESULTS: Of the 858 retrieved citations, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective cohort study. Low to moderate evidence suggests that there are no significant differences in most measures of disability, pain, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, and safety between groups. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and inconsistent differences between groups with respect to Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks postoperatively or Short Form-36 Physical Component Score at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, postoperative bracing does not result in improved outcomes after spinal surgery. Future high-quality randomized trials will be required to confirm these findings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1525
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Bin
    Xu, Shuai
    Guo, Chen
    Jin, Linyu
    Liu, Chenjun
    Liu, Haiying
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [32] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for spine surgery -review of literature
    Naftalovich, Rotem
    Singal, Amit
    Iskander, Andrew J.
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2022, 54 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [33] Commentary on: The Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of Available Literature
    Friedmann, Daniel P.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (07) : 837 - 838
  • [34] Safety and efficacy of POEM for treatment of achalasia: a systematic review of the literature
    Oscar M. Crespin
    Louis W. C. Liu
    Ambica Parmar
    Timothy D. Jackson
    Jemila Hamid
    Eran Shlomovitz
    Allan Okrainec
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2187 - 2201
  • [35] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Trends in Adult Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Tong, Yixuan
    Fernandez, Laviel
    Bendo, John A.
    Spivak, Jeffrey M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04): : 623 - 640
  • [36] The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tulsi in Humans: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Jamshidi, Negar
    Cohen, Marc M.
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic literature review
    Sanmarti, Raimon
    Tornero, Jesus
    Narvaez, Javier
    Munoz, Alejandro
    Garmendia, Elena
    Ortiz, Ana M.
    Angel Abad, Miguel
    Moya, Patricia
    Lourdes Mateo, Maria
    Reina, Delia
    Salvatierra-Ossorio, Juan
    Rodriguez, Sergio
    Palmou-Fontana, Natalia
    Ruibal-Escribano, Ana
    Calvo-Alen, Jaime
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2020, 16 (03): : 222 - 228
  • [38] Safety and efficacy of POEM for treatment of achalasia: a systematic review of the literature
    Crespin, Oscar M.
    Liu, Louis W. C.
    Parmar, Ambica
    Jackson, Timothy D.
    Hamid, Jemila
    Shlomovitz, Eran
    Okrainec, Allan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (05): : 2187 - 2201
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of Rituximab in vasculitic neuropathy: a systematic review of the literature
    Mena-Vazquez, Natalia
    Cabezudo-Garcia, Pablo
    Fuego Varela, Clara
    Manrique-Arija, Sara
    Fernandez-Nebro, Antonio
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2019, 15 (03): : 173 - 178
  • [40] Bracing after ACL reconstruction - A systematic review
    Wright, Rick W.
    Fetzer, Gary B.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (455) : 162 - 168