Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

被引:22
|
作者
Zhu, Mary P. [1 ]
Tetreault, Lindsay A. [2 ,3 ]
Sorefan-Mangou, Fatimah [3 ]
Garwood, Philip [3 ]
Wilson, Jefferson R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Med, Grad Entry Med, Coll Rd, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2018年 / 18卷 / 09期
关键词
Complications; Outcomes; Postoperative bracing; Spinal pathology; Surgery; Systematic review; ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS; DEGENERATIVE CONDITIONS; FUSION; COLLAR; TRIAL; MOTION; INDIVIDUALS; DISKECTOMY; INTERBODY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bracing is often used after spinal surgery to immobilize the spine, improve fusion, and relieve pain. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy, necessity, and safety of various bracing techniques in the postsurgical setting. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of postoperative bracing versus no postoperative bracing after spinal surgery in patients with several common operative spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Asystematic review was carried out to compare postoperative bracing and no postoperative bracing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from 1970 to May 2017, supplemented by manual searching of the reference list of relevant studies and previously published reviews. Studies were included if they compared disability, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, or complications between patients treated with postoperative bracing and patients not receiving any postoperative bracing. Each article was critically appraised independently by two reviewers, and the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. RESULTS: Of the 858 retrieved citations, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective cohort study. Low to moderate evidence suggests that there are no significant differences in most measures of disability, pain, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, and safety between groups. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and inconsistent differences between groups with respect to Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks postoperatively or Short Form-36 Physical Component Score at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, postoperative bracing does not result in improved outcomes after spinal surgery. Future high-quality randomized trials will be required to confirm these findings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1525
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: a systematic review
    Elsarrag, Mazin
    Soldozy, Sauson
    Patel, Parantap
    Norat, Pedro
    Sokolowski, Jennifer D.
    Park, Min S.
    Tvrdik, Petr
    Kalani, M. Yashar S.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (04)
  • [22] Sexual activity after spine surgery: a systematic review
    Malik, Azeem Tariq
    Jain, Nikhil
    Kim, Jeffery
    Khan, Safdar N.
    Yu, Elizabeth
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (10) : 2395 - 2426
  • [23] The Utility of Postoperative Bracing on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Hasan, Sazid
    Babrowicz, Joseph
    Waheed, Muhammad A.
    Piche, Joshua David
    Patel, Rakesh
    Aleem, Ilyas
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (02) : 512 - 522
  • [24] A systematic literature review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of filgrastim
    David C. Dale
    Jeffrey Crawford
    Zandra Klippel
    Maureen Reiner
    Timothy Osslund
    Ellen Fan
    Phuong Khanh Morrow
    Kim Allcott
    Gary H. Lyman
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018, 26 : 7 - 20
  • [25] The Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of Available Literature
    Derrick, Chase D.
    Shridharani, Sachin M.
    Broyles, Justin M.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (07) : 830 - 836
  • [26] A systematic literature review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of filgrastim
    Dale, David C.
    Crawford, Jeffrey
    Klippel, Zandra
    Reiner, Maureen
    Osslund, Timothy
    Fan, Ellen
    Morrow, Phuong Khanh
    Allcott, Kim
    Lyman, Gary H.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (01) : 7 - 20
  • [27] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Dietz, Nicholas
    Sharma, Mayur
    Adams, Shawn
    Alhourani, Ahmad
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Wang, Dengzhi
    Nuno, Miriam
    Drazin, Doniel
    Boakye, Maxwell
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 130 : 415 - 426
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review
    Novarria, Gabriele Alessandro
    Vultaggio, Federica
    Saginario, Vittorio
    Felisati, Giovanni
    Saibene, Alberto Maria
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (12) : 6187 - 6199
  • [29] Outcomes after surgery for cervical spine deformity: review of the literature
    Erame, Arnold B.
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Than, Khoi D.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (03)
  • [30] The Effects of Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Jackson, Keith L., II
    Devine, John G.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (07) : 695 - 701