Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

被引:22
|
作者
Zhu, Mary P. [1 ]
Tetreault, Lindsay A. [2 ,3 ]
Sorefan-Mangou, Fatimah [3 ]
Garwood, Philip [3 ]
Wilson, Jefferson R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Med, Grad Entry Med, Coll Rd, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2018年 / 18卷 / 09期
关键词
Complications; Outcomes; Postoperative bracing; Spinal pathology; Surgery; Systematic review; ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS; DEGENERATIVE CONDITIONS; FUSION; COLLAR; TRIAL; MOTION; INDIVIDUALS; DISKECTOMY; INTERBODY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bracing is often used after spinal surgery to immobilize the spine, improve fusion, and relieve pain. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy, necessity, and safety of various bracing techniques in the postsurgical setting. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of postoperative bracing versus no postoperative bracing after spinal surgery in patients with several common operative spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Asystematic review was carried out to compare postoperative bracing and no postoperative bracing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from 1970 to May 2017, supplemented by manual searching of the reference list of relevant studies and previously published reviews. Studies were included if they compared disability, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, or complications between patients treated with postoperative bracing and patients not receiving any postoperative bracing. Each article was critically appraised independently by two reviewers, and the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. RESULTS: Of the 858 retrieved citations, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective cohort study. Low to moderate evidence suggests that there are no significant differences in most measures of disability, pain, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, and safety between groups. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and inconsistent differences between groups with respect to Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks postoperatively or Short Form-36 Physical Component Score at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, postoperative bracing does not result in improved outcomes after spinal surgery. Future high-quality randomized trials will be required to confirm these findings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1525
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review
    Nasi, Davide
    Dobran, Mauro
    Pavesi, Giacomo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (02) : 321 - 331
  • [2] The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review
    Davide Nasi
    Mauro Dobran
    Giacomo Pavesi
    European Spine Journal, 2020, 29 : 321 - 331
  • [3] MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics
    Jeff A. Lehmen
    Edward J. Gerber
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 287 - 313
  • [4] MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics
    Lehmen, Jeff A.
    Gerber, Edward J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S287 - S313
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of robotic spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luengo-Matos, Setefilla
    Maria Sanchez-Gomez, Luis
    Isabel Hijas-Gomez, Ana
    Elena Garcia-Carpintero, Esther
    Ballesteros-Masso, Rafael
    Polo-deSantos, Mar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of robotic spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Setefilla Luengo-Matos
    Luis María Sánchez-Gómez
    Ana Isabel Hijas-Gómez
    Esther Elena García-Carpintero
    Rafael Ballesteros-Massó
    Mar Polo-deSantos
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2022, 23
  • [7] Rhabdomyolysis and spine surgery: A systematic review of the literature
    Portella, Stella Taylor
    Acioly, Marcus Andre
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 70 : 178 - 182
  • [8] Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature
    Lopez, Ignacio Barrio
    Benzakour, Ahmed
    Mavrogenis, Andreas
    Benzakour, Thami
    Ahmad, Alaaeldin
    Lemee, Jean-Michel
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (02) : 447 - 456
  • [9] Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature
    Ignacio Barrio Lopez
    Ahmed Benzakour
    Andreas Mavrogenis
    Thami Benzakour
    Alaaeldin Ahmad
    Jean-Michel Lemée
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 447 - 456
  • [10] Costal Surgery for Waist Improvement Safety and Efficacy: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Danilla, Stefan
    Gonzalez-Arestizabal, Tomas
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025,