Gas-Water Flow Behavior in Water-Bearing Tight Gas Reservoirs

被引:11
作者
Cao, Renyi [1 ]
Ye, Liyou [2 ]
Lei, Qihong [3 ]
Chen, Xinhua [1 ]
Ma, Y. Zee [4 ]
Huang, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Petr Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina RIPED, Dept Porous Flow & Fluid Mech, Langfang 065007, Peoples R China
[3] PetroChina, Changqing Oil Field, Res Inst Explorat & Dev, Xian 710021, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Schlumberger, Denver, CO 80202 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
THRESHOLD PRESSURE-GRADIENT; RELATIVE PERMEABILITY; POROUS-MEDIA; CORES;
D O I
10.1155/2017/9745795
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Some tight sandstone gas reservoirs contain mobile water, and the mobile water generally has a significant impact on the gas flowing in tight pores. The flow behavior of gas and water in tight pores is different than in conventional formations, yet there is a lack of adequate models to predict the gas production and describe the gas-water flow behaviors in water-bearing tight gas reservoirs. Based on the experimental results, this paper presents mathematical models to describe flow behaviors of gas and water in tight gas formations; the threshold pressure gradient, stress sensitivity, and relative permeability are all considered in our models. A numerical simulator using these models has been developed to improve the flow simulation accuracy for water-bearing tight gas reservoirs. The results show that the effect of stress sensitivity becomes larger as water saturation increases, leading to a fast decline of gas production; in addition, the nonlinear flow of gas phase is aggravated with the increase of water saturation and the decrease of permeability. The gas recovery decreases when the threshold pressure gradient (TPG) and stress sensitivity are taken into account. Therefore, a reasonable drawdown pressure should be set to minimize the damage of nonlinear factors to gas recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Pore pressure versus confining pressure and their effect on oil-water relative permeability curves [J].
Al-Quraishi, A ;
Khairy, M .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 48 (1-2) :120-126
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1952, J PETROL TECHNOL, DOI DOI 10.2118/952329-G
[3]   Threshold pressure as a measure of degree of rock wettability and diagenesis in consolidated Omani limestone cores [J].
Boukadi, F ;
Bemani, A ;
Rumhy, M ;
Kalbani, M .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 1998, 15 (01) :33-39
[4]  
BURDINE NT, 1953, T AM I MIN MET ENG, V198, P71
[5]  
Civan F., 2013, SOC PETROLEUM ENG
[6]  
Corey A. T., 1954, Producers Monthly, V19, P38
[7]   Dynamic threshold pressure gradient in tight gas reservoir [J].
Ding, Jingchen ;
Yang, Shenglai ;
Nie, Xiangrong ;
Wang, Zhilin .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 20 :155-160
[8]  
Fatt I., 1953, J PETROL TECHNOL, V5, P15, DOI [10.2118/953325-G, DOI 10.2118/953325-G]
[9]  
Gao S.S., 2013, J OIL GAS TECHNOL, V7, P20
[10]   A LABORATORY STUDY OF LOW-PERMEABILITY GAS SANDS [J].
JONES, FO ;
OWENS, WW .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1980, 32 (09) :1631-1640