RBF Neural Networks Modeling Methodology Compared to Non-Parametric Auto-Associative Models for Condition Monitoring Applications.

被引:0
作者
Duarte Alves, Marco Aurelio [1 ]
Galotto Junior, Luigi [1 ]
Pereira Pinto, Joao Onofre [1 ]
Garcia, Raymundo Cordero [1 ]
Teixeira, Herbert [2 ]
Campos, Mario C. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Mato G do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
[2] Petrobras SA, CENPES Res Ctr, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
来源
IECON 2018 - 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY | 2018年
关键词
Radial Basis Function Neural Network; Auto-associative Kernel Regression; Fault Detection; Training; Robustness; Accuracy; Spillover; Filtering; FAULT-DETECTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This work presents the use of radial basis function artificial neural network to estimate the sensors readings, exploring the analytical redundancy via auto association. However, in order to guarantee good performance of the network the training and optimization process was modified. In the conventional training algorithm, although the stop criteria, such as summed squared error, is reached, one or more of the individual performance metrics, including: i) accuracy; ii) robustness; iii) spillover and iv) filtering matrix of the neural network may not be satisfactory. The paper describes the proposed algorithm including all the mathematical foundation. A dataset of a petroleum refinery is used to train a RBF network using the conventional and the modified algorithm and the performance of both will be evaluated. Furthermore, AAKR model is used to the same dataset. Finally, a comparison study of the developed models will be done for each of the performance metrics, as well as for the overall effectiveness in order to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:5406 / 5411
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Comparison of Data-Driven Reconstruction Methods For Fault Detection
    Baraldi, Piero
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Genini, Davide
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2015, 64 (03) : 852 - 860
  • [2] cha J. M., 2017, 2017 IEEE INT SYST E, P1, DOI [10.1109/SysEng.2017.8088327, DOI 10.1109/SYSENG.2017.8088327]
  • [3] Fault Detection in Nuclear Power Plants Components by a Combination of Statistical Methods
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Baraldi, Piero
    Zio, Enrico
    Seraoui, Redouane
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2013, 62 (04) : 833 - 845
  • [4] Sensor Compensation in Motor Drives using Kernel Regression
    Galotto, L.
    Pinto, J. O. P.
    Ozpineci, B.
    Leite, L. C.
    Borges, L. E. S.
    [J]. IEEE IEMDC 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES AND DRIVES CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 229 - +
  • [5] Galotto L, 2015, PROC IEEE INT SYMP, P600, DOI 10.1109/ISIE.2015.7281536
  • [6] Development and Application of Fault Detectability Performance Metrics for Instrument Calibration Verification and Anomaly Detection
    Hines, J. Wesley
    Garvey, Dustin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION RESEARCH, 2006, 1 (01): : 2 - 15
  • [7] An embedded fault detection, isolation and accommodation system in a model predictive controller for an industrial benchmark process
    Kettunen, Markus
    Zhang, Ping
    Jaemsae-Jounela, Sirkka-Liisa
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 32 (12) : 2966 - 2985
  • [8] Kristjanpoller F., 2016, RELIABILITY ASSESSME, P1101, DOI [10.1201/9781315374987-166, DOI 10.1201/9781315374987-166]
  • [9] Sharif MA, 1998, IEEE IMTC P, P770, DOI 10.1109/IMTC.1998.676830
  • [10] Sundararajan N., 1999, REV RADIAL BASIS FUN, P1, DOI [10.1142/9789812812506_0001, DOI 10.1142/9789812812506_0001]