Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination

被引:54
作者
Srinivasan, Malathi
Hauer, Karen E.
Der-Martirosian, Claudia
Wilkes, Michael
Gesundheit, Neil
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sacramento, CA 95833 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
multicentre study; controlled cohort observational study; humans; students; medical; *feedback; *education; medical undergraduate; *learning; clinical competence/*standards; *self-assessment (psychology); physical examination; medical history taking; communication;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02818.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
CONTEXT Achieving competence in 'practice-based learning' implies that doctors can accurately self- assess their clinical skills to identify behaviours that need improvement. This study examines the impact of receiving feedback via performance benchmarks on medical students' self-assessment after a clinical performance examination (CPX). METHODS The authors developed a practice-based learning exercise at 3 institutions following a required 8-station CPX for medical students at the end of Year 3. Standardised patients (SPs) scored students after each station using checklists developed by experts. Students assessed their own performance immediately after the CPX (Phase 1). One month later, students watched their videotaped performance and reassessed (Phase 2). Some students received performance benchmarks (their scores, plus normative class data) before the video review. Pearson's correlations between self-ratings and SP ratings were calculated for overall performance and specific skill areas (history taking, physical examination, doctor-patient communication) for Phase 1 and Phase 2. The 2 correlations were then compared for each student group (i.e. those who received and those who did not receive feedback). RESULTS A total of 280 students completed both study phases. Mean CPX scores ranged from 51% to 71% of items correct overall and for each skill area. Phase 1 self-assessment correlated weakly with SP ratings of student performance (r = 0.01-0.16). Without feedback, Phase 2 correlations remained weak (r = 0.13-0.18; n = 109). With feedback, Phase 2 correlations improved significantly (r = 0.26-0.47; n = 171). Low-performing students showed the greatest improvement after receiving feedback. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of student self-assessment was poor after a CPX, but improved significantly with performance feedback (scores and benchmarks). Videotape review alone (without feedback) did not improve self-assessment accuracy. Practice-based learning exercises that incorporate feedback to medical students hold promise to improve self-assessment skills.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Abrams R G, 1974, J Dent Educ, V28, P385
  • [2] *ACCR COUNC GRAD M, OUTC IN
  • [3] ANTONELLI MS, 1997, ACAD MED, V72, P63
  • [4] Enhancing self-awareness in medical students: An overview of teaching approaches
    Benbassat, J
    Baumal, R
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [5] Preventing errors in clinical practice:: A call for self-awareness
    Borrell-Carrió, F
    Epstein, RM
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (04) : 310 - 316
  • [6] EVALUATING MEDICAL-STUDENT CLINICAL SKILL PERFORMANCE - RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SELF, PEER, AND EXPERT RATINGS
    CALHOUN, JG
    WOOLLISCROFT, JO
    TENHAKEN, JD
    WOLF, FM
    DAVIS, WK
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1988, 11 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [7] Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence - A systematic review
    Davis, David A.
    Mazmanian, Paul E.
    Fordis, Michael
    Van Harrison, R.
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Perrier, Laure
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (09): : 1094 - 1102
  • [8] Mindful practice
    Epstein, RM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09): : 833 - 839
  • [9] FRYE AW, 1991, MED EDUC, V25, P310
  • [10] A REVIEW OF THE VALIDITY AND ACCURACY OF SELF-ASSESSMENTS IN HEALTH-PROFESSIONS TRAINING
    GORDON, MJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1991, 66 (12) : 762 - 769