Right dose, right now: bedside, real-time, data-driven, and personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock-a two-centre randomised clinical trial

被引:34
作者
Roggeveen, Luca F. [1 ]
Guo, Tingjie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fleuren, Lucas M. [1 ]
Driessen, Ronald [1 ]
Thoral, Patrick [1 ]
van Hest, Reinier M. [2 ]
Mathot, Ron A. A. [2 ]
Swart, Eleonora L. [2 ]
de Grooth, Harm-Jan [1 ]
van den Bogaard, Bas [4 ]
Girbes, Armand R. J. [1 ]
Bosman, Rob J. [4 ]
Elbers, Paul W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Lab Crit Care Computat Intelligence LCCCI, Amsterdam Med Data Sci AMDS,Amsterdam UMC,Dept In, Amsterdam Cardiovasc Sci ACS,Amsterdam Inst Infec, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Pharm & Clin Pharmacol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Div Syst Biomed & Pharmacol, Leiden Acad Ctr Drug Res LACDR, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] OLVG Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Sepsis; Therapeutic drug monitoring; Pharmacokinetics; Clinical decision support; PHARMACOKINETICS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-022-04098-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Adequate antibiotic dosing may improve outcomes in critically ill patients but is challenging due to altered and variable pharmacokinetics. To address this challenge, AutoKinetics was developed, a decision support system for bedside, real-time, data-driven and personalised antibiotic dosing. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of its clinical implementation. Methods In this two-centre randomised clinical trial, critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock were randomised to AutoKinetics dosing or standard dosing for four antibiotics: vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and ceftriaxone. Adult patients with a confirmed or suspected infection and either lactate > 2 mmol/L or vasopressor requirement were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was pharmacokinetic target attainment in the first 24 h after randomisation. Clinical endpoints included mortality, ICU length of stay and incidence of acute kidney injury. Results After inclusion of 252 patients, the study was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the ciprofloxacin intervention group, the primary outcome was obtained in 69% compared to 3% in the control group (OR 62.5, CI 11.4-1173.78, p < 0.001). Furthermore, target attainment was faster (26 h, CI 18-42 h, p < 0.001) and better (65% increase, CI 49-84%, p < 0.001). For the other antibiotics, AutoKinetics dosing did not improve target attainment. Clinical endpoints were not significantly different. Importantly, higher dosing did not lead to increased mortality or renal failure. Conclusions In critically ill patients, personalised dosing was feasible, safe and significantly improved target attainment for ciprofloxacin. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), NL6501/NTR6689 on 25 August 2017 and at the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2017-002478-37 on 6 November 2017.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Beumier M, 2015, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V81, P497
  • [2] Does contemporary vancomycin dosing achieve therapeutic targets in a heterogeneous clinical cohort of critically ill patients? Data from the multinational DALI study
    Blot, Stijn
    Koulenti, Despoina
    Akova, Murat
    Bassetti, Matteo
    De Waele, Jan J.
    Dimopoulos, George
    Kaukonen, Kirsi-Maija
    Martin, Claude
    Montravers, Philippe
    Rello, Jordi
    Rhodes, Andrew
    Starr, Therese
    Wallis, Steven C.
    Lipman, Jeffrey
    Roberts, Jason A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (03):
  • [3] A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
    Collins, Francis S.
    Varmus, Harold
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (09) : 793 - 795
  • [4] Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
    Coopersmith, Craig M.
    De Backer, Daniel
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Ferrer, Ricard
    Lat, Lshaq
    Machado, Flavia R.
    Martin, Greg S.
    Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
    Nunnally, Mark E.
    Antonelli, Massimo
    Evans, Laura E.
    Hellman, Judith
    Jog, Sameer
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Rhodes, Andrew
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (09) : 1400 - 1426
  • [5] The future of antimicrobial dosing in the ICU: an opportunity for data science
    De Corte, Thomas
    Elbers, Paul
    De Waele, Jan
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 47 (12) : 1481 - 1483
  • [6] Unexplained mortality differences between septic shock trials: a systematic analysis of population characteristics and control-group mortality rates
    de Grooth, Harm-Jan
    Postema, Jonne
    Loer, Stephan A.
    Parienti, Jean-Jacques
    Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M.
    Girbes, Armand R.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (03) : 311 - 322
  • [7] SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
    de Grooth, Harm-Jan
    Geenen, Irma L.
    Girbes, Armand R.
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    Parienti, Jean-Jacques
    Straaten, Heleen M. Oudemans-van
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [8] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2020, BREAKPOINT TABLES IN
  • [9] Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic knowledge on antibiotic dosing among intensive care professionals is insufficient: a cross-sectional study
    Fleuren, Lucas M.
    Roggeveen, Luca F.
    Guo, Tingjie
    Waldauf, Petr
    van der Voort, Peter H. J.
    Bosman, Rob J.
    Swart, Eleonora L.
    Girbes, Armand R. J.
    Elbers, Paul W. G.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1):
  • [10] Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation
    Han, Baoguang
    Enas, Nathan H.
    McEntegart, Damian
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (27) : 3329 - 3346