The Impact of Sampling Methodology on Soil Bulk Density Measurement by the Clod Method

被引:2
作者
Airori, A. J. [1 ]
Baker, T. J. [1 ]
Turk, J. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Conservat & Survey Div, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Soil bulk density; volumetric analyses; soil sampling; CARBON; COMPACTION;
D O I
10.1080/00103624.2021.1993887
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The clod method is a widely used and accurate bulk density method. However, its use is limited to sampling from soil pits. This study was conducted to: 1) determine whether clods collected from cores provide similar bulk density measurements to those collected from soil pits and 2) evaluate the impact of various clod bulk density methods on carbon stock calculation. Clods were collected from soil pits, 5.1 cm soil cores, and 8.9 cm soil cores. Three-dimensional laser scanning was used to measure the volume of the soil clods before and after oven-drying and bulk density was calculated as the dry mass of the clod divided by volume. Of 24 horizons sampled, 17 showed no significant effect of sampling method (core vs. pit) on dry bulk density. The error introduced by collecting clods from a core was small enough that it had no significant effect on carbon stock (p = .683). However, the moisture at which clods were scanned did have a significant effect on carbon stocks (p = .002 to 0.016). Data from the study suggest that collecting clods from soil cores introduces minimal error, but attention should be given to the moisture state at which clod volume is determined.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 326
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Arshad M. A., 1996, Methods for assessing soil quality., P123
  • [2] Soil compaction and soil management - a review
    Batey, T.
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 25 (04) : 335 - 345
  • [3] Last Glacial loess in the conterminous USA
    Bettis, EA
    Muhs, DR
    Roberts, HM
    Wintle, AG
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2003, 22 (18-19) : 1907 - 1946
  • [4] Boone RD, 1999, LT EC RES NETWK SER, V2, P3
  • [5] Does Sampler Size Affect Southeastern Piedmont Forest Soil Bulk Density Estimation?
    Coates, T. Adam
    Waldrop, Thomas A.
    Shelburne, Victor B.
    Hill, Hoke S.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2018, 49 (06) : 701 - 707
  • [6] Quantifying and Comparing Soil Carbon Stocks: Underestimation with the Core Sampling Method
    Gross, Cole D.
    Harrison, Robert B.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (04) : 949 - 959
  • [7] Grossman R.B., 2002, METHODS SOIL ANAL, P201, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4.C9
  • [8] Hammer R.R., 1981, SOIL SURVEY CLAY COU
  • [9] Soil compaction in cropping systems - A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions
    Hamza, MA
    Anderson, WK
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2005, 82 (02) : 121 - 145
  • [10] Simple modification of the clod method for determining bulk density of very gravelly soils
    Hirmas, D. R.
    Furquim, S. A. C.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2006, 37 (7-8) : 899 - 906