A Flexible Retransmission Policy For Industrial Wireless Sensor Actuator Networks

被引:16
作者
Brummet, Ryan [1 ]
Gunatilaka, Dolvara [2 ]
Vyas, Dhruv [1 ]
Chipara, Octav [1 ]
Lu, Chenyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Comp Sci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL INTERNET (ICII 2018) | 2018年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICII.2018.00017
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Real-time and reliable communication is essential for industrial wireless sensor-actuator networks. To this end, researchers have proposed a wide range of transmission scheduling techniques. However, these methods usually employ a link-centric policy which allocates a fixed number of retransmissions for each link of a flow. The lack of flexibility of this approach is problematic because failures do not occur uniformly across links and link quality changes over time. In this paper, we propose a flow-centric policy to flexibly and dynamically reallocate retransmissions among the links of a multi-hop flow at runtime. This contribution is complemented by a method for determining the number of retransmissions necessary to achieve a user-specified reliability level under two failures models that capture the common wireless properties of industrial environments. We demonstrate the effectiveness of flow centric policies using empirical evaluations and trace-driven simulations. Testbed experiments indicate a flow-centric policy can provide higher reliability than a link-centric policy because of its flexibility. Trace-driven experiments compare link-centric and flow-centric policies under the two reliability models. Results indicate that when the two approaches are configured to achieve the same reliability level, a flow-centric approach increases the median real-time capacity by as much as 1.42 times and reduces the end-to-end response times by as much as 2.63 times.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Candell R., 2017, NISTTN1951
  • [2] Cerpa Alberto., 2005, MOBIHOC
  • [3] Duquennoy S., 2015, SENSYS
  • [4] Eriksson M., 2016, IEEE T COMMUNICATION
  • [5] Ferens K., 2009, CCECE
  • [6] Gonga A., 2012, ICDCS
  • [7] Han S., 2011, RTAS
  • [8] Incel O. D., 2011, COMPUTER NETWORKS
  • [9] Lu C., 2017, IEEE INFOCOM SER, P1
  • [10] Munir S., 2010, IPSN