Return to work predictors after traumatic brain injury in a welfare state

被引:14
作者
Odgaard, L. [1 ,2 ]
Pedersen, A. R. [1 ,2 ]
Poulsen, I. [3 ]
Johnsen, S. P. [4 ]
Nielsen, J. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Hammel Neurorehabil Ctr, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Univ Res Clin, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Dept Neurorehabil, TBI & Res Unit Brain Injury Rehabil RUBRIC, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2018年 / 137卷 / 01期
关键词
competing risk regression; functional abilities; labour market attachment; rehabilitation trajectories; return to work; socio-economic factors; traumatic brain injury; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; AGE INDIVIDUALS; FOLLOW-UP; EMPLOYMENT; MODERATE; REHABILITATION; POPULATION; DISABILITY; STABILITY; DENMARK;
D O I
10.1111/ane.12806
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo identify predictors of return to work (RTW) and stable labour market attachment (LMA) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Denmark. Materials & methodsPatients aged 18-64years, admitted to highly specialized neurorehabilitation after severe TBI 2004-2012 were included and followed up for 6years. Weekly LMA data were retrieved from a national register of public assistance benefits. Weeks without or with supplemental public assistance benefits were defined as LMA weeks. Time of RTW was defined as first week with LMA. Stable LMA was defined as weeks with LMA 75% first year after RTW. Multivariable regressions were used to identify predictors of RTW and stable LMA among preinjury characteristics, injury severity, functional ability and rehabilitation trajectories. ResultsFor the analyses of RTW and stable LMA, 651 and 336 patients were included, respectively. RTW was significantly associated with age (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), education (1.83, 95% CI 1.16-2.89), supplemental benefits (3.97, 95% CI 2.04-7.71), no benefits (4.86, 95% CI 2.90-8.17), length of stay in acute care (0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99) and time period of injury (1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.10). The only significant predictor of stable LMA was age (adjusted odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99). ConclusionRTW after severe TBI was associated with several socio-economic factors, whereas maintaining LMA depended on age only. We suggest that RTW rates could be improved by extensive rehabilitation targeting people that are older and low-educated, as these were less likely to RTW.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Posttraumatic Headache and Its Impact on Return to Work After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Dumke, Heike Andrea
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (02) : E55 - E65
  • [22] Predictors of Satisfaction With Life in Veterans After Traumatic Brain Injury: A VA TBI Model Systems Study
    Gause, Leah R.
    Finn, Jacob A.
    Lamberty, Greg J.
    Tang, Xinyu
    Stevens, Lillian Flores
    Eapen, Blessen C.
    Nakase-Richardson, Risa
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (04) : 255 - 263
  • [23] The experience of return to work in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): A qualitative study
    Libeson, Lauren
    Downing, Marina
    Ross, Pamela
    Ponsford, Jennie
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 30 (03) : 412 - 429
  • [24] Predictive Factors of Return Home and Return to Work for Intensive Care Unit Survivors after Traumatic Brain Injury with a Follow-up Period of 2 Years
    Yabuno, Satoru
    Yasuhara, Takao
    Murai, Satoshi
    Yumoto, Tetsuya
    Naito, Hiromichi
    Nakao, Atsunori
    Date, Isao
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2022, 62 (10) : 465 - 474
  • [25] Participation in competitive employment after severe traumatic brain injury: New employment versus return to previous (pre-injury) employment
    Simpson, Grahame K.
    McRae, Philippa
    Hallab, Lisa
    Daher, Maysaa
    Strettles, Barbara
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 30 (06) : 995 - 1012
  • [26] Return to Pre-Injury Work Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Kahan, Michael
    Jones, Kelly M.
    Balalla, Shivanthi
    McPherson, Kathryn
    Stedman, Elisabeth
    Feigin, Valery L.
    BRAIN IMPAIRMENT, 2018, 19 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [27] Work Productivity Loss After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Silverberg, Noah D.
    Panenka, William J.
    Iverson, Grant L.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (02): : 250 - 256
  • [28] How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: A systematic review
    van Velzen, J. M.
    van Bennekom, C. A. M.
    Edelaar, M. J. A.
    Sluiter, J. K.
    Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2009, 23 (06) : 473 - 488
  • [29] Return to Work After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Follow-up Study
    Odgaard, Lene
    Johnsen, Soren Paaske
    Pedersen, Asger Roer
    Nielsen, Jorgen Feldbaek
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (03) : E57 - E64
  • [30] Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter study
    Walker, William C.
    Marwitz, Jennifer H.
    Kreutzer, Jeffrey S.
    Hart, Tessa
    Novack, Thomas A.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (12): : 1576 - 1582