Engaging Patients as Partners in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer-A Review of the Literature

被引:13
|
作者
Camuso, Natasha [1 ]
Bajaj, Prerna [1 ]
Dudgeon, Deborah [1 ,2 ]
Mitera, Gunita [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Partnership Canc, 1 Univ Ave,Suite 300, Toronto, ON M5J 2P1, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 4th Floor,155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
[4] Coll Family Phys Canada, 2630 Skymark Ave, Mississauga, ON L4W 5A4, Canada
关键词
Cancer; Patient engagement; Patient-reported outcome measurement; NONMELANOMA SKIN-CANCER; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; LIFE INSTRUMENT; QUALITY; INDEX; VALIDATION; SYMPTOMS; CARE; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-016-3151-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Tools to collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in the healthcare setting to collect information that is most meaningful to patients. Due to discordance among how patients and healthcare providers rank symptoms that are considered most meaningful to the patient, engagement of patients in the development of PROMs is extremely important. This review aimed to identify studies that described how patients are involved in the item generation stage of cancer-specific PROM tools developed for cancer patients. A literature search was conducted using keywords relevant to PROMs, cancer, and patient engagement. A manual search of relevant reference lists was also conducted. Inclusion criteria stipulated that publications must describe patient engagement in the item generation stage of development of cancer-specific PROM tools. Results were excluded if they were duplicate findings or non-English. The initial search yielded 230 publications. After removal of duplicates and review of publications, 6 were deemed relevant. Fourteen additional publications were retrieved through a manual search of references from relevant publications. A total of 13 unique PROM tools that included patient input in item generation were identified. The most common method of patient engagement was through qualitative interviews or focus groups. Despite recommendations from international groups and the emphasized importance of incorporating patient feedback in all stages of development of PROMs, few unique tools have incorporated patient input in item generation of cancer-specific tools. Moving forward, a framework of best practices on how to best engage patients in developing PROMs is warranted to support high-quality patient-centered care.
引用
收藏
页码:3543 / 3549
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Engaging Patients as Partners in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer—A Review of the Literature
    Natasha Camuso
    Prerna Bajaj
    Deborah Dudgeon
    Gunita Mitera
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3543 - 3549
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Shilling, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 1859 - 1876
  • [3] A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013
    Gibbons, E.
    Casanas i Comabella, C.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (06) : 1176 - 1186
  • [4] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
    Sharma, Garima
    Chiva-Razavi, Sima
    Viriato, Daniel
    Naujoks, Christel
    Patalano, Francesco
    Bentley, Sarah
    Findley, Amy
    Johnson, Chloe
    Arbuckle, Rob
    Wolffsohn, James
    BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01):
  • [6] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR ADULT DENTAL PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Mittal, Hina
    John, Mike T.
    Sekulic, Stella
    Theis-Mahon, Nicole
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [7] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Valerie Shilling
    Lucy Matthews
    Valerie Jenkins
    Lesley Fallowfield
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 1859 - 1876
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in gynaecological oncology: a systematic review
    Preston, N. J.
    Wilson, N.
    Wood, N. J.
    Brine, J.
    Ferreira, J.
    Brearley, S. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (05) : 615 - 622
  • [9] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151
  • [10] Methods for shortening patient-reported outcome measures
    Harel, Daphna
    Baron, Murray
    Hudson, M.
    Gyger, G.
    Pope, J.
    Larche, M.
    Khalidi, N.
    Masetto, A.
    Sutton, E.
    Robinson, D.
    Rodriguez-Reyna, T. S.
    Smith, D.
    Thorne, C.
    Fortin, P. R.
    Fritzler, M.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (10-11) : 2992 - 3011