Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds

被引:171
作者
Smith, Adam C. [1 ]
Fahrig, Lenore [1 ]
Francis, Charles M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Geomat & Landscape Ecol Res Lab, Ottawa, ON KIS 5B6, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Canadian Wildlife Serv, Environm Canada, Ottawa, ON KIA 0H3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PATCH-SIZE; ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION; POPULATIONS; SURVIVAL; ECOLOGY; MATTERS; COVER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06201.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
It is important to understand the relative effects of landscape habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on biodiversity, so that potential management options can be appropriately ranked. However, their effects and relative importance may change with the size of the landscape considered because the multiple (and potentially conflicting) ecological processes that are influenced by landscape structure occur at different spatial scales (e.g. dispersal, predation, foraging). We estimated the relative effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality (measured as the amount of forest, the proportion of forest area contained in large core forests, and the density of roads respectively) on fragmentation-sensitive forest birds in southern Ontario, Canada using a range of landscape sizes (0.8-310 km2). We used three complementary statistical approaches to estimate relative effects of these correlated landscape factors - 1) multiple regression, 2) information theoretic (AIC) estimates of the most parsimonious model, and 3) multi-model inference to average effects across all supported models. We controlled for spatial autocorrelation, local habitat, roadside sampling bias, time of day, season, habitat heterogeneity, and the interaction between the effects of habitat amount and fragmentation. We found that relative effects of habitat amount and fragmentation were scale dependent; habitat amount had a consistently positive effect that was consistent over more than two orders of magnitude in landscape area (similar to 1-300 km2). In contrast, the effects of habitat fragmentation depended on the size of the landscape considered. Indeed, for veery Catharus fuscescens, habitat fragmentation had positive effects at one scale and negative effects at another. The effects of matrix quality were generally weak and changed little with scale. For the number of fragmentation sensitive species and the presence of veery, habitat amount was most important in large landscapes and habitat fragmentation in small landscapes but for the presence of ovenbird Seiurus aurocapilla, habitat amount was most important at all scales.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 113
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] ECOLOGICAL NEIGHBORHOODS - SCALING ENVIRONMENTAL PATTERNS
    ADDICOTT, JF
    AHO, JM
    ANTOLIN, MF
    PADILLA, DK
    RICHARDSON, JS
    SOLUK, DA
    [J]. OIKOS, 1987, 49 (03) : 340 - 346
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, NATL ECOLOGICAL FRAM
  • [5] Austen MJW, 2001, CONDOR, V103, P701, DOI 10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0701:LCAFEO]2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure
    Betts, Matthew G.
    Forbes, Graham J.
    Diamond, Antony W.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 1046 - 1058
  • [8] Betts MG, 2006, ECOL APPL, V16, P1076, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1076:IEOFOF]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Estimating species richness: The importance of heterogeneity in species detectability
    Boulinier, T
    Nichols, JD
    Sauer, JR
    Hines, JE
    Pollock, KH
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1998, 79 (03) : 1018 - 1028