Results of late flap removal after complicated laser in situ keratomileusis

被引:5
作者
Epstein, AJ
Clinch, TE
Moshirfar, M
Schanzlin, DJ
Volpicelli, M
机构
[1] Middlesex Eye Phs PC, Middletown, CT 06457 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Ophtalm Consultants Washington, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Utah, John Moran Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Ophthalmol, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Eye Phys & Surg, Mountain View, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.045
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of flap removal on complications after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: Three university-based referral centers and 1 private practice. Methods: This retrospective interventional case series comprised 6 eyes of 6 patients at 4 centers. Flap removal occurred 2 to 41 weeks after the LASIK procedure. The corneal flaps were excised by 2 methods: In 2 eyes, the flap was lifted and excised manually. In 4 eyes, the thin flap was removed by excimer ablation using phototherapeutic keratectomy and/or photorefractive keratectomy. Postoperative measurements included uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, slitlamp evaluation, and computerized videokeratography. All patients had an 8-month or longer convalescence to assess visual recovery. Results: After the initial flap complication, the BSCVA decreased in all 6 eyes (mean loss 3.0 lines +/- 1.5 [SD]). After flap removal, it improved in all eyes (mean gain 2.2 +/- 1.2 lines). All patients reported a reduction in or elimination of visual symptoms. Despite the improvements, a minor loss of BSCVA (mean -0.8 lines [range 0 to 2 lines]) remained in 4 patients. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, flap removal is a viable surgical option to improve visual function.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 510
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Carones, F ;
Vigo, L ;
Scandola, E ;
Vacchini, L .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (12) :2088-2095
[2]   Prospective comparison of single zone and multizone laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of low myopia [J].
Carr, JD ;
Stulting, RD ;
Sano, Y ;
Thompson, KP ;
Wiley, W ;
Waring, GO .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (08) :1504-1511
[3]  
Castillo A, 1998, J REFRACT SURG, V14, P61
[4]   Sloughing of corneal epithelium and wound healing complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy [J].
Dastgheib, KA ;
Clinch, TE ;
Manche, EE ;
Hersh, P ;
Ramsey, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 130 (03) :297-303
[5]  
Davidorf JM, 1998, J REFRACT SURG, V14, P114
[6]   CORNEOSCLERAL ULCERATION AND CORNEAL PERFORATION AFTER PTERYGIUM EXCISION AND TOPICAL MITOMYCIN-C THERAPY [J].
FUJITANI, A ;
HAYASAKA, S ;
SHIBUYA, Y ;
NODA, S .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1993, 207 (03) :162-164
[7]   Experience during the learning curve of laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Gimbel, HV ;
Basti, S ;
Kaye, GB ;
Ferensowicz, M .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (05) :542-550
[8]   Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive laser in situ keratomileusis cases [J].
Gimbel, HV ;
Penno, EEA ;
van Westenbrugge, JA ;
Ferensowicz, M ;
Furlong, MT .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (10) :1839-1847
[9]   Diffuse lamellar keratitis related to endotoxins released from sterilizer reservoir biofilms [J].
Holland, SP ;
Mathias, RG ;
Morck, DW ;
Chiu, J ;
Slade, SG .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (07) :1227-1233
[10]  
JAMPEL HD, 1992, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V99, P1471