WHAT ARE CONSTITUTIONS, AND WHAT SHOULD (AND CAN) THEY DO?

被引:12
作者
Alexander, Larry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0265052510000038
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A constitution is, as Article VI of the United States Constitution declares, the fundamental law of the land, supreme as a legal matter over any other nonconstitutional law. But that almost banal statement raises a number of theoretically vexed issues. What is law? How is constitutional law to be distinguished from nonconstitutional law? How do morality and moral rights fit into the picture? And what are the implications of the answers to these questions for such questions as how and by whom should constitutions be interpreted? These are the issues that I shall address. Alexander proceeds as follows: In section I he takes up law's principal function of settling controversies over what we are morally obligated to do. In section II he then relate law's settlement function to the role of constitutional law. In particular, he discusses how constitutional law is distinguished from ordinary law, and he also discusses the role of constitutions in establishing basic governmental structures and enforcing certain moral rights. In section III he addresses the topic of constitutional interpretation, and in section IV the topic of judicial review. Finally, in section V, he discusses constitutional change, both change that occurs through a constitution's own rules for amendments and change that is the product of constitutional misinterpretations and revolutions. © 2011 Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Roosevelt K, 2005, VA LAW REV, V91, P1649
  • [22] Rights and moral reasoning: An unstated assumption-025EFA comment on Jeremy Waldron's "Judges as moral reasoners"
    Sadurski, Wojciech
    [J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2009, 7 (01): : 25 - 45
  • [23] SCHAUER Frederick, 1995, Responding to Imperfection. The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, P145
  • [24] Seidman L., 2007, Silence and freedom
  • [25] Smith Tara, 2007, DUKE J CONSTITUTIONA, V2, P189
  • [26] Smith Tara., 2007, Duke Journal of Constitutional Law Public Policy, V2, P159
  • [27] Judges as moral reasoners
    Waldron, Jeremy
    [J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2009, 7 (01): : 2 - 24
  • [28] Waldron Jeremy., 1999, LAW DISAGREEMENT
  • [29] THE EMPTY IDEA OF EQUALITY
    WESTEN, P
    [J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1982, 95 (03) : 537 - 596