Sensitivity analysis of different wind speed distribution models with actual and truncated wind data: A case study for Kerman, Iran

被引:76
作者
Alavi, Omid [1 ]
Sedaghat, Ahmad [2 ]
Mostafaeipour, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[3] Yazd Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Yazd, Iran
关键词
Wind speed; Comparative evaluation; Weibull distribution; Anemometer accuracy; Probability density functions; Kerman province; PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION; TURBINE UTILIZATION; POWER; PARAMETERS; GENERATION; PROVINCE; CLIMATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.078
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Accuracy of wind speed data has important impact on determining wind power output from a wind turbine. There are many researches on four widely used wind speed distribution models described by gamma, lognormal, Rayleigh and Weibull for assessing wind potentials. However, there is lack of studies to evaluate sensitivity of these models with respect to accuracy of the measured wind data. In this paper, wind speed data are obtained from SUNA (renewable energy organization of Iran) for two years period from 2014 to 2016 in 10 min time intervals, for five stations in the province of Kerman in Iran. The maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) and method of moments (MOM) are used for calculating parameters involved with these four distribution functions. For sensitivity analysis, a truncated set of wind data is generated by removing the decimal digits of the wind data; reducing the resolution to 1 m/s. The best fit functions to actual and truncated wind speed data are selected by examining nine goodness-of-fit statistics. From the results, it is observed that the lognormal function gives a better fit to the actual data, while the Weibull model performs better using the truncated wind speed data. The Rayleigh distribution does not fit well for both data types. The MOM method has performed better for calculating the parameters of the gamma distribution while the MLE is the preferred method for obtaining the parameters of the Weibull function particularly when working with truncated wind data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Impact of wind-energy generation on climate: A rising spectre [J].
Abbasi, S. A. ;
Tabassum-Abbasi ;
Abbasi, Tasneem .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 :1591-1598
[2]  
Abbes D., 2010, 2010 14th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE/PEMC 2010), P28, DOI 10.1109/EPEPEMC.2010.5606826
[3]   Technical, economic and uncertainty modelling of a wind farm project [J].
Afanasyeva, Svetlana ;
Saari, Jussi ;
Kalkofen, Martin ;
Partanen, Jarmo ;
Pyrhoenen, Olli .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 107 :22-33
[4]   An alternative distribution to Weibull for modeling the wind speed data: Inverse Weibull distribution [J].
Akgul, Fatma Gul ;
Senoglu, Birdal ;
Arslan, Talha .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 114 :234-240
[5]   Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential [J].
Arslan, Talha ;
Bulut, Y. Murat ;
Yavuz, Arzu Altin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :820-825
[6]   Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications [J].
Azad, Abul Kalam ;
Rasul, Mohammad Golam ;
Yusaf, Talal .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) :3056-3085
[7]  
Bolstad BM, 1998, THESIS
[8]   Evaluation of the climate change impact on wind resources in Taiwan Strait [J].
Chang, Tsang-Jung ;
Chen, Chun-Lung ;
Tu, Yi-Long ;
Yeh, Hung-Te ;
Wu, Yu-Ting .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 95 :435-445
[9]   Evaluation of wind energy potential in province of Bushehr, Iran [J].
Dabbaghiyan, Amir ;
Fazelpour, Farivar ;
Abnavi, Mohhamadreza Dehghan ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 :455-466
[10]   HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts [J].
Dawson, C. W. ;
Abrahart, R. J. ;
See, L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (07) :1034-1052