An assessment of the Surgical Apgar Score in spine surgery

被引:16
作者
Urrutia, Julio [1 ]
Valdes, Macarena [1 ]
Zamora, Tomas [1 ]
Canessa, Valentina [1 ]
Briceno, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Surgical Apgar Score; Postoperative complications; Patient outcome assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.042
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS), a simple metric based on intraoperative heart rate, blood pressure, and blood loss, was developed in general and vascular surgery to predict 30-day major postoperative complications and mortality. No validation of SAS has been performed in spine surgery. PURPOSE: To perform a prospective assessment of SAS in spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred sixty-eight consecutive patients undergoing major and intermediate spinal surgeries in an 18-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of major complications or death within 30 days of surgery. METHODS: Intraoperative parameters were registered, and SAS was calculated immediately after surgery. Outcome data were collected during a 30-day follow-up. The relationship between SAS and the outcomes was analyzed calculating relative risks (RRs) and likelihood ratios (LRs) for different scoring groups. A univariate logistic regression analysis was also performed. The discriminatory accuracy of SAS was evaluated calculating a C-statistic. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had >= 1 complications (6.72%). Patients with SAS 9-10 exhibited a 1.64% complication rate (RR51; LR50.23), which monotonically augmented as the score decreased: (SAS 7-8=2.75%; RR=1.68; LR=0.39), (SAS 5-6=13.33%; RR=8.13; LR=2.14), (SAS <= 4=17.39%; RR=10.61; LR=2.92). The regression analysis odds ratio was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.82), p<. 01. The C-statistic was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical Apgar Score allows risk stratification and has a good discriminatory power in patients undergoing spine surgery. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 109
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] An Apgar score for surgery
    Gawande, Atul A.
    Kwaan, Mary R.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Lipsitz, Stuart A.
    Zinner, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [2] Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: Validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries
    Haynes, Alex B.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Weiser, Thomas G.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Dziekan, Gerald
    Berry, William R.
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2011, 149 (04) : 519 - 524
  • [3] An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery
    Mohamed, K
    Copeland, GP
    Boot, DA
    Casserley, HC
    Shackleford, IM
    Sherry, PG
    Stewart, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05): : 735 - 739
  • [4] Assessment of the Surgical Apgar Score in a Swedish setting
    Ohlsson, H.
    Winso, O.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 55 (05) : 524 - 529
  • [5] Surgical Apgar Outcome Score: Perioperative Risk Assessment for Radical Cystectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Ferreria, Marcos
    Berry, Alexander M.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Gawande, Atul A.
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (03) : 1046 - 1052
  • [6] Prasad SM, 2009, J UROLOGY, V181, P52
  • [7] The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Bordeianou, Liliana
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2010, 148 (03) : 559 - 566
  • [8] Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score Validation in 4119 Patients
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [9] Expansion of the Surgical Apgar Score across All Surgical Subspecialties as a Means to Predict Postoperative Mortality
    Reynolds, Paul Q.
    Sanders, Neal W.
    Schildcrout, Jonathan S.
    Mercaldo, Nathaniel D.
    St Jacques, Paul J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 114 (06) : 1305 - 1312
  • [10] Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications?
    Romano, PS
    Schembri, ME
    Rainwater, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2002, 17 (04) : 145 - 154