Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management A Randomized Trial

被引:272
作者
Heisler, Michele [1 ]
Vijan, Sandeep
Makki, Fatima
Piette, John D.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Hlth Syst, Ann Arbor, MI 48113 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SELF-MANAGEMENT; INSULIN THERAPY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CHRONIC ILLNESS; INTERVENTIONS; HEALTH; EDUCATION; DISEASE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Resource barriers complicate diabetes care management. Support from peers may help patients manage their diabetes. Objective: To compare a reciprocal peer-support (RPS) program with nurse care management (NCM). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00320112) Setting: 2 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. Patients: 244 men with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels greater than 7.5% during the previous 6 months. Measurements: The primary outcome was 6-month change in HbA(1c) level. Secondary outcomes were changes in insulin therapy; blood pressure; and patient reports of medication adherence, diabetes-related support, and emotional distress. Intervention: Patients in the RPS group attended an initial group session to set diabetes-related behavioral goals, receive peer communication skills training, and be paired with another age-matched peer patient. Peers were encouraged to talk weekly using a telephone platform that recorded call occurrence and provided reminders to promote peer contact. These patients could also participate in optional group sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients in the NCM group attended a 1.5-hour educational session and were assigned to a nurse care manager. Results: Of the 244 patients enrolled, 216 (89%) completed the HbA(1c) assessments and 231 (95%) completed the survey assessments at 6 months. Mean HbA(1c) level decreased from 8.02% to 7.73% (change, -0.29%) in the RPS group and increased from 7.93% to 8.22% (change, 0.29%) in the NCM group. The difference in HbA(1c) change between groups was 0.58% (P = 0.004). Among patients with a baseline HbA(1c) level greater than 8.0%, those in the RPS group had a mean decrease of 0.88%, compared with a 0.07% decrease among those in the NCM group (between-group difference, 0.81%; P < 0.001). Eight patients in the RPS group started insulin therapy, compared with 1 patient in the NCM group (P = 0.020). Groups did not differ in blood pressure, self-reported medication adherence, or diabetes-specific distress, but the RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support. Limitation: The study included only male veterans and lasted only 6 months. Conclusion: Reciprocal peer support holds promise as a method for diabetes care management.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 515
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] *AM COLL PHYS, 2010, PAT CTR MED HOM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials
  • [3] Evaluation of diagnostic reliability of DCA 2000 for rapid and simple monitoring of HbA1c
    Arsie, MP
    Marchioro, L
    Lapolla, A
    Giacchetto, GF
    Bordin, MR
    Rizzotti, P
    Fedele, D
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2000, 37 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [4] Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
  • [5] Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management
    Barrera, M
    Glasgow, RE
    McKay, HG
    Boles, SM
    Feil, EG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 30 (05) : 637 - 654
  • [6] Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: An exploration and status report
    Bodenheimer, Thomas
    Handley, Margaret A.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 76 (02) : 174 - 180
  • [7] Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality
    Brown, SL
    Nesse, RM
    Vinokur, AD
    Smith, DM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (04) : 320 - 327
  • [8] CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
    Campbell, MK
    Elbourne, DR
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 702 - 708
  • [9] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [10] Group visits: Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines
    Clancy, Dawn E.
    Huang, Peng
    Okonofua, Eni
    Yeager, Derik
    Magruder, Kathryn Marley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (05) : 620 - 624