A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design

被引:7
作者
Bandos, AI [1 ]
Rockette, HE
Gur, D
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
observer performance; ROC; technology assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2004.08.013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To develop a conditional nonparametric procedure for comparing two correlated areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). Materials and Methods. A nonparametric conditional test to compare areas under two ROC curves was developed using the distribution of the elements of the nonparametric AUC estimators in a permutation space. The conditioning is made on the observed discordances between the relative orderings of ratings of the normal and abnormal cases for the two modalities taken over all possible pairs. The type I error of the procedure was verified using computer simulations. The power of the test was compared with an existing unconditional procedure on simulated datasets from binormal distributions as well as from a mixture of binormal distributions of ratings. Results. The proposed test is conservative for low sample sizes, large AUC, and high correlation between modalities. It possesses a reasonable type I error for sample sizes as low as 20 actually positive and 20 actually negative cases. In plausible situations in which the sample in observer performance studies can not be monotonically transformed into a binormal distribution, this approach may have modest power advantages over the conventional nonparametric test. Conclusion. The conditional nonparametric test presented here is an alternative approach to existing unconditional procedures and may offer advantages in certain types of observer performance studies.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   AREA ABOVE ORDINAL DOMINANCE GRAPH AND AREA BELOW RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC GRAPH [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (04) :387-415
[2]  
BANDOS AI, 2003, MED IM PERC SOC C 10
[3]  
BANDOS AI, IN PRESS STAT MED
[4]   ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND LABORATORY TESTS [J].
CAMPBELL, G .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (5-7) :499-508
[5]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[6]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL-DETECTION THEORY AND DETERMINATION OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS - RATING-METHOD DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :487-&
[7]   THE ROBUSTNESS OF THE BINORMAL ASSUMPTIONS USED IN FITTING ROC CURVES [J].
HANLEY, JA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1988, 8 (03) :197-203
[8]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]  
Metz C E., 1984, Information Processing in Medical Imaging VIII, P432