Reading Is Fundamentally Similar Across Disparate Writing Systems: A Systematic Characterization of How Words and Characters Influence Eye Movements in Chinese Reading

被引:97
作者
Li, Xingshan [1 ]
Bicknell, Klinton [2 ]
Liu, Pingping [1 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ]
Rayner, Keith [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chinese reading; eye movements; mixed-effects regression; E-Z-READER; OBTAIN PREVIEW BENEFIT; PERCEPTUAL-SPAN; SACCADE GENERATION; DYNAMICAL MODEL; FIXATION TIMES; FREQUENCY; PREDICTABILITY; ATTENTION; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1037/a0033580
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While much previous work on reading in languages with alphabetic scripts has suggested that reading is word-based, reading in Chinese has been argued to be less reliant on words. This is primarily because in the Chinese writing system words are not spatially segmented, and characters are themselves complex visual objects. Here, we present a systematic characterization of the effects of a wide range of word and character properties on eye movements in Chinese reading, using a set of mixed-effects regression models. The results reveal a rich pattern of effects of the properties of the current, previous, and next words on a range of reading measures, which is strikingly similar to the pattern of effects of word properties reported in spaced alphabetic languages. This finding provides evidence that reading shares a word-based core and may be fundamentally similar across languages with highly dissimilar scripts. We show that these findings are robust to the inclusion of character properties in the regression models and are equally reliable when dependent measures are defined in terms of characters rather than words, providing strong evidence that word properties have effects in Chinese reading above and beyond characters. This systematic characterization of the effects of word and character properties in Chinese advances our knowledge of the processes underlying reading and informs the future development of models of reading. More generally, however, this work suggests that differences in script may not alter the fundamental nature of reading.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 913
页数:19
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MIXED EFFECTS MODELS, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, C&H TEXT STAT SCI, DOI 10.1201/9781315382722
[4]  
[Anonymous], COGNITIVE CULTURAL I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LME4 MIXED EFFECTS M
[6]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[7]   Reading spaced and unspaced chinese text: Evidence from eye movements [J].
Bai, Xuejun ;
Yan, Guoli ;
Liversedge, Simon P. ;
Zang, Chuanli ;
Rayner, Keith .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 34 (05) :1277-1287
[8]   THE INTERACTION OF CONTEXTUAL CONSTRAINTS AND PARAFOVEAL VISUAL INFORMATION IN READING [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
POLLATSEK, A ;
RAYNER, K .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 17 (03) :364-390
[9]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[10]  
Bates D., 2010, IME4 LINEAR MIXED EF