Realist power europe? The EU in the negotiations about China's and Russia's WTO accession

被引:57
作者
Zimmermann, Hubert [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Govt, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00749.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
What determines the preferences the EU represents in international trade negotiations? This article argues that realist theories can help to answer this question. Whereas, the majority of the literature on EU trade policy-making looks at 'domestic' variables such as institutional factors and the influence of interest groups, a systemic approach such as realism is rarely employed. However, as the empirical case studies of China's and Russia's WTO accession show, in international trade negotiations the EU is motivated by geoeconomic and mercantilist considerations to an important degree, specifically the interest to maximize EU wealth relative to other powers. The article is a pledge for taking realism seriously in research on preference formation in EU external policies.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 832
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Aggarwal Vinod K., 2004, EU TRADE STRATEGIES
[2]  
Algieri F, 2002, CHINA Q SPEC ISS, P64
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NATL POWER STRUCTURE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Unipolar Politics: Realism State Strategies After the Cold War
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, INT NEGOT
[6]  
ANTKIEWICZ A, 2007, WORKSH EU INT TRAD N
[7]  
ASH R, 2002, CHINAS ACCESSION WTO
[8]  
ASLUND A, 2004, KYOTO COULD BE RUSSI
[9]   The institutional roots of American trade policy [J].
Bailey, MA ;
Goldstein, J ;
Weingast, BR .
WORLD POLITICS, 1997, 49 (03) :309-&
[10]  
BRETHERTON C, 2006, INT STUDIES PERSPECT, V7, P1