Evaluation of the In vivo Radiosensitizing Activity of Etanidazole Using Tumor-bearing Chick Embryo

被引:19
作者
Abe, Chiaki [1 ]
Uto, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Nakae, Takashi [1 ]
Shinmoto, Yuuya [1 ]
Sano, Keiichiro [1 ]
Nakata, Hiroko [1 ]
Teraoka, Mizue [1 ]
Endo, Yoshio [2 ]
Maezawa, Hiroshi [3 ]
Masunaga, Shin-ichiro [4 ]
Nakata, Eiji [1 ]
Hori, Hitoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokushima, Grad Sch, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Life Syst, Tokushima 7708506, Japan
[2] Kanazawa Univ, Canc Res Inst, Cent Res Resource Branch, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9201192, Japan
[3] Univ Tokushima, Grad Sch, Inst Hlth Biosci, Tokushima 7708503, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Inst Res Reactor, Particle Radiat Oncol Res Ctr, Osaka 5900494, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; CANCER; RADIATION; HYPOXIA; ANALOG; NIMORAZOLE; TOXICITY; CELLS; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1269/jrr.10122
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Tumor-bearing chick embryo/In vivo/Hypoxic cell radiosensitizer/Etanidazole/Radiosensitizing activity. Chick embryos have been used as alternative experimental animals in various research fields, including virology, immunology, toxicology, oncology, and embryology. Until now, there have been no in vivo models using chick embryo to evaluate radiosensitizing activity. Here, the in vivo radiosensitizing activity of etanidazole, a well-known hypoxic cell radiosensitizer, was evaluated using tumor-bearing chick embryo. On the basis of tumor growth, drug administration and X-ray irradiation were performed on day 15 chick embryo, with the endpoint being day 18 chick embryo. In day 15 chick embryo, an X-ray irradiation dose of equal or less than 10 Gy did not cause significant tumor growth suppression. Intravenous administration of equal or less than 1.0 mg of etanidazole did not cause tumor growth suppression. Neither doses of equal or less than 8 Gy of irradiation nor 1.0 mg of etanidazole caused fatality of the chick embryo. On the basis of these results, we evaluated the radiosensitizing effect of a combination treatment with 8 Gy of irradiation and 1.0 mg of etanidazole. As noted above, 1.0 mg of etanidazole alone and 8 Gy of irradiation alone did not show tumor growth suppression. In contrast, a combination treatment with 8 Gy of irradiation and 1.0 mg of etanidazole showed 35% of significant tumor growth suppression. Thus, we succeeded in evaluating the in vivo radiosensitizing activity of etanidazole using tumor-bearing chick embryo. These results suggest that the use of tumor-bearing chick embryo may be part of a promising system for evaluating radiosensitizing activity.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 214
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment
    Brown, JM
    William, WR
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2004, 4 (06) : 437 - 447
  • [2] Clofarabine acts as radiosensitizer in vitro and in vivo by interfering with DNA damage response
    Cariveau, Mickael J.
    Stackhouse, Murray
    Cui, Xiao-Li
    Tiwari, Kamal
    Waud, William
    Secrist, John A., III
    Xu, Bo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01): : 213 - 220
  • [3] Hypoxia enhances tumor stemness by increasing the invasive and tumorigenic side population fraction
    Das, Bikul
    Tsuchida, Rika
    Malkin, David
    Koren, Gideon
    Baruchel, Sylvain
    Yeger, Herman
    [J]. STEM CELLS, 2008, 26 (07) : 1818 - 1830
  • [4] Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells
    Diehn, Maximilian
    Cho, Robert W.
    Lobo, Neethan A.
    Kalisky, Tomer
    Dorie, Mary Jo
    Kulp, Angela N.
    Qian, Dalong
    Lam, Jessica S.
    Ailles, Laurie E.
    Wong, Manzhi
    Joshua, Benzion
    Kaplan, Michael J.
    Wapnir, Irene
    Dirbas, Frederick M.
    Somlo, George
    Garberoglio, Carlos
    Paz, Benjamin
    Shen, Jeannie
    Lau, Sean K.
    Quake, Stephen R.
    Brown, J. Martin
    Weissman, Irving L.
    Clarke, Michael F.
    [J]. NATURE, 2009, 458 (7239) : 780 - U123
  • [5] Phase I-B trial of the radiosensitizer: Etanidazole (SR-2508) with radiosurgery for the treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors or brain metastases (RTOG Study 95-02)
    Drzymala, R. E.
    Wasserman, T. H.
    Won, M.
    Shaw, E.
    Cmelak, A. J.
    Loeffler, J.
    Souhami, L.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 87 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [6] EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS OF ONCOGENE-TRANSFORMED NIH-3T3 CELLS IN CHICK-EMBRYO
    ENDO, Y
    SEIKI, M
    UCHIDA, H
    NOGUCHI, M
    KIDA, Y
    SATO, H
    MAI, M
    SASAKI, T
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1992, 83 (03): : 274 - 280
  • [7] GRAHN D, 1957, GENETICS, V42, P189
  • [8] The hallmarks of cancer
    Hanahan, D
    Weinberg, RA
    [J]. CELL, 2000, 100 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [9] HERMAN TS, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P2734
  • [10] JENSEN MM, 2008, BMC MED IMAGING, V16, P8