The validity of scopolamine as a pharmacological model for cognitive impairment: A review of animal behavioral studies

被引:551
作者
Klinkenberg, Inge [1 ]
Blokland, Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Neuropsychol & Psychopharmacol, EURON, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Acetylcholine; Alzheimer's disease; Learning; Memory; Attention; Anxiety; Sensory discrimination; Muscarinic M1; Side-effects; Signal detection; Cognition; Model; MUSCARINIC CHOLINERGIC-RECEPTORS; SPATIAL WORKING-MEMORY; ARM MAZE PERFORMANCE; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; DELAYED CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION; OBJECT RECOGNITION MEMORY; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; SPONTANEOUS-ALTERNATION PERFORMANCE; OVERTRAINING-INDUCED PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Scopolamine is used as a standard/reference drug for inducing cognitive deficits in healthy humans and animals. Effects are often interpreted in terms of a role of acetylcholine in mnemonic and/or attentional processes. In this paper an overview is given of the effects of scopolamine on animal behavior. Examination of the dose-response curve of systemically administered scopolamine indicates that sensory discrimination and attention are most sensitive to disruption. When higher doses (>0.03 mg/kg) are used, deficits in other cognitive and non-cognitive functions (e.g., learning and memory, locomotor activity) are reported. Several behavioral processes (taste aversion, anxiety, short-term memory, attention) are found to be affected after intracerebral injections of scopolamine. It is concluded that effects on learning and memory performance which are observed after higher doses of scopolamine are mediated by (1) primary effects on attention and sensory/stimulus discrimination, (2) non-specific effects on behavior (e.g., locomotor activity, anxiety), and (3) peripheral side-effects (e.g., pupil dilation, salivation). Finally, the validity of scopolamine as a pharmacological model for cognitive impairment is discussed. The use of muscarinic M1 antagonists is suggested as a more selective and effective way of inducing cholinergic-induced cognitive deficits. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1350
页数:44
相关论文
共 370 条
[1]   Perirhinal N-methyl-D-aspartate and muscarinic systems participate in object recognition in rats [J].
Abe, H ;
Ishida, Y ;
Iwasaki, T .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 356 (03) :191-194
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF SCOPOLAMINE ADMINISTERED BEFORE AND AFTER ACQUISITION IN A TEST OF VISUAL RECOGNITION MEMORY IN MONKEYS [J].
AIGNER, TG ;
WALKER, DL ;
MISHKIN, M .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 55 (01) :61-67
[3]   SCOPOLAMINE IMPAIRS RECALL OF ONE-TRIAL STIMULUS REWARD ASSOCIATION IN MONKEYS [J].
AIGNER, TG ;
MISHKIN, M .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1993, 54 (02) :133-136
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF PHYSOSTIGMINE AND SCOPOLAMINE ON RECOGNITION MEMORY IN MONKEYS [J].
AIGNER, TG ;
MISHKIN, M .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 45 (01) :81-87
[5]  
AIGNER TG, 1991, BEHAV NEURAL BIOL, V55, P380
[6]   SHORT-TERM-MEMORY - FACILITATION AND DISRUPTION WITH CHOLINERGIC AGENTS [J].
ALPERN, HP ;
MARRIOTT, JG .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1973, 11 (04) :571-575
[7]   SCOPOLAMINE SELECTIVELY DISRUPTS THE ACQUISITION OF CONTEXTUAL FEAR CONDITIONING IN RATS [J].
ANAGNOSTARAS, SG ;
MAREN, S ;
FANSELOW, MS .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1995, 64 (03) :191-194
[8]   Scopolamine and pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: Dose-effect analysis [J].
Anagnostaras, SG ;
Maren, S ;
Sage, JR ;
Goodrich, S ;
Fanselow, MS .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 21 (06) :731-744
[9]   EFFECTS OF DISRUPTING THE CHOLINERGIC SYSTEM ON SHORT-TERM SPATIAL MEMORY IN RATS [J].
ANDREWS, JS ;
JANSEN, JHM ;
LINDERS, S ;
PRINCEN, A .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 115 (04) :485-494
[10]   EFFECTS OF CHOLINERGIC AND NONCHOLINERGIC DRUGS ON VISUAL-DISCRIMINATION AND DELAYED VISUAL-DISCRIMINATION PERFORMANCE IN RATS [J].
ANDREWS, JS ;
GRUTZNER, M ;
STEPHENS, DN .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 (04) :523-530