Digital twins in agri-food : Societal and ethical themes and questions for further research

被引:19
作者
van der Burg, Simone [1 ]
Kloppenburg, Sanneke [2 ]
Kok, Esther J. [3 ]
van der Voort, Mariska [4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Econ Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Food Safety Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Business Econ Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
NJAS-IMPACT IN AGRICULTURAL AND LIFE SCIENCES | 2021年 / 93卷 / 01期
关键词
Responsible research and innovation (RRI); agri-food; digital twin; societal and ethical challenges; BIG DATA; AGRICULTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; INTERNET; FUTURE; ROBOTS; RIGHTS; COWS;
D O I
10.1080/27685241.2021.1989269
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Digital Twins are computational representations of both living and non-living entities and processes, which can be used to analyse and simulate interventions in these entities and processes. When developing Digital Twins, it is important to anticipate on the societal, ethical and safety impacts they may have. Since in the agri-food domain Digital Twins are still in its infancy, it is possible to include societal values from the beginning onwards, during the research and development process. In this paper, we present four themes (i.e. resources, representations, actions and implementations) to organise the anticipation of and reflection on potential impacts of Digital Twins in the agri-food domain. Using insights from the smart farming literature, we assess for each theme which issues and questions require further research and attention, in order to develop an agenda for responsible research and innovation on Digital Twins.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 125
页数:28
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Dietary changes during the Great Recession in Portugal: comparing the 2005/2006 and the 2014 health surveys [J].
Alves, Ricardo ;
Perelman, Julian .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2019, 22 (11) :1971-1978
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Responsible Innovation, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118551424.CH3
[3]  
AWTI, 2015, WEGEN NAAR MENSWAARD
[4]   Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What's In, What's Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated? [J].
Barrett, Hannah ;
Rose, David Christian .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2022, 62 (02) :162-189
[5]   Legal framework for small autonomous agricultural robots [J].
Basu, Subhajit ;
Omotubora, Adekemi ;
Beeson, Matt ;
Fox, Charles .
AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (01) :113-134
[6]  
Blok Vincent., 2019, International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, P243, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781784718862.00024
[7]  
Bos J., 2016, Digitalisering van dieren - Verkenning Precision Livestock Farming
[8]   The Quantified Animal: Precision Livestock Farming and the Ethical Implications of Objectification [J].
Bos J.M. ;
Bovenkerk B. ;
Feindt P.H. ;
van Dam Y.K. .
Food Ethics, 2018, 2 (1) :77-92
[9]   Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming [J].
Bronson, Kelly .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91
[10]   Smart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation [J].
Bronson, Kelly .
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 8 (02) :7-14