CONSIDERING DIFFERENT MOTIVATIONS IN DESIGN FOR CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR CHANGE

被引:0
作者
Srivastava, Jayesh [1 ]
Shu, L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 7 | 2016年
关键词
CONSUMPTION; ADOPTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Much existing work aims to understand how to change human behavior through product-design interventions. Given the diversity of individuals and their motivations, solutions that address different motives are surprisingly rare. We aim to develop and validate a framework that clearly identifies and targets different types of behavioral motives in users. We present a behavior model comprising egoistic, sociocultural and altruistic motives, and apply the model to sustainable behavior. We confirmed the explanatory power of the behavior model by categorizing user comments about an international environmental agreement from multiple news sources. We next developed concepts, each intended to target a single motive type, and elicited evaluations from online respondents who self-assessed their motivation type after evaluating the concepts. We present and discuss correlation results between motive types and preference for products that target these types for two iterations of the experiment. Deviations from our expected results are mainly due to unexpected perceptions, both positive and negative, of our concepts. Despite this, the main value of this work lies in the explicit consideration of a manageable number of different types of motives. A proposed design tool incorporates the three types of motives from the model with the different levels of persuasion others have proposed to change user behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Alexa Internet Inc, 2015, TOP SIT ALL CAT NEWS
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Working paper 15916
[5]  
[Anonymous], JOURNAL, DOI DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1978, HUMAN COMPUTER CONTR
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[8]   Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands [J].
Bockarjova, M. ;
Steg, L. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 28 :276-288
[9]   When Crowdsourcing Fails: A Study of Expertise on Crowdsourced Design Evaluation [J].
Burnap, Alex ;
Ren, Yi ;
Gerth, Richard ;
Papazoglou, Giannis ;
Gonzalez, Richard ;
Papalambros, Panos Y. .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2015, 137 (03)
[10]   A positioning typology of consumers' perceptions of the benefits offered by successful service brands [J].
Burton, Jamie ;
Easingwood, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2006, 13 (05) :301-316