Combining multi-indicators with machine-learning algorithms for maize at the-level in China

被引:48
作者
Cheng, Minghan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Penuelas, Josep [5 ]
McCabe, Matthew F. [6 ]
Atzberger, Clement [7 ]
Jiao, Xiyun [4 ]
Wu, Wenbin [2 ]
Jin, Xiuliang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Crop Sci, Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Key Lab Crop Physiol & Ecol, Minist Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Natl Nanfan Res Inst Sanya, Sanya 572024, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] UAB, Global Ecol Unit CREAF, CSIC, Catalonia, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[6] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Water Desalinat & Reuse Ctr, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[7] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Geomatics, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yield prediction; Multiple indicators; Machine learning; Optimal lead time; Spatial autocorrelation; CROP YIELD PREDICTION; LEAF-AREA INDEX; WINTER-WHEAT; TIME-SERIES; SOLAR-RADIATION; DATA FUSION; MODIS; MODEL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109057
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The accurate and timely prediction of crop yield at a large scale is important for food security and the development of agricultural policy. An adaptable and robust method for estimating maize yield for the entire territory of China, however, is currently not available. The inherent trade-off between early estimates of yield and the accuracy of yield prediction also remains a confounding issue. To explore these challenges, we employ indicators such as GPP, ET, surface temperature (Ts), LAI, soil properties and maize phenological information with random forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) machine learning approaches to provide maize yield estimates within China. The aims were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy of maize yield prediction obtained from multimodal data analysis using machine-learning; (2) identify the optimal period for estimating yield; and (3) determine the spatial robustness and adaptability of the proposed method. The results can be summarized as: (1) RFR estimated maize yield more accurately than GBDT; (2) Ts was the best single indicator for estimating yield, while the combination of GPP, Ts, ET and LAI proved best when multi-indicators were used (R-2 = 0.77 and rRMSE = 16.15% for the RFR); (3) the prediction accuracy was lower with earlier lead time but remained relatively high within at least 24 days before maturity (R-2 > 0.77 and rRMSE < 16.92%); and (4) combining machine-learning algorithms with multi-indicators demonstrated a capacity to cope with the spatial heterogeneity. Overall, this study provides a reliable reference for managing agricultural production.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [71] Usefulness and limits of MODIS GPP for estimating wheat yield
    Reeves, MC
    Zhao, M
    Running, SW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (07) : 1403 - 1421
  • [72] Using Low Resolution Satellite Imagery for Yield Prediction and Yield Anomaly Detection
    Rembold, Felix
    Atzberger, Clement
    Savin, Igor
    Rojas, Oscar
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (04) : 1704 - 1733
  • [73] Data fusion of spectral, thermal and canopy height parameters for improved yield prediction of drought stressed spring barley
    Rischbeck, Pablo
    Elsayed, Salah
    Mistele, Bodo
    Barmeier, Gero
    Heil, Kurt
    Schmidhalter, Urs
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2016, 78 : 44 - 59
  • [74] Near real-time prediction of US corn yields based on time-series MODIS data
    Sakamoto, Toshihiro
    Gitelson, Anatoly A.
    Arkebauer, Timothy J.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 147 : 219 - 231
  • [75] MODIS-based corn grain yield estimation model incorporating crop phenology information
    Sakamoto, Toshihiro
    Gitelson, Anatoly A.
    Arkebauer, Timothy J.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 131 : 215 - 231
  • [76] Assessing yield and fertilizer response in heterogeneous smallholder fields with UAVs and satellites
    Schut, Antonius G. T.
    Traore, Pierre C. Sibiry
    Blaes, Xavier
    de By, Rolf A.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 221 : 98 - 107
  • [77] Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil
    Schwalbert, Rai A.
    Amado, Telmo
    Corassa, Geomar
    Pott, Luan Pierre
    Prasad, P. V. Vara
    Ciampitti, Ignacio A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 284
  • [78] Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen's model
    Shakoor, Rabia
    Hassan, Mohammad Yusri
    Raheem, Abdur
    Wu, Yuan-Kang
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 : 1048 - 1059
  • [79] Testing Remote Sensing Approaches for Assessing Yield Variability among Maize Fields
    Sibley, Adam M.
    Grassini, Patricio
    Thomas, Nancy E.
    Cassman, Kenneth G.
    Lobell, David B.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [80] Estimating Wheat Yield in China at the Field and District Scale from the Assimilation of Satellite Data into the Aquacrop and Simple Algorithm for Yield (SAFY) Models
    Silvestro, Paolo Cosmo
    Pignatti, Stefano
    Pascucci, Simone
    Yang, Hao
    Li, Zhenhai
    Yang, Guijun
    Huang, Wenjiang
    Casa, Raffaele
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (05)