Combining multi-indicators with machine-learning algorithms for maize at the-level in China

被引:48
作者
Cheng, Minghan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Penuelas, Josep [5 ]
McCabe, Matthew F. [6 ]
Atzberger, Clement [7 ]
Jiao, Xiyun [4 ]
Wu, Wenbin [2 ]
Jin, Xiuliang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Crop Sci, Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Key Lab Crop Physiol & Ecol, Minist Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Natl Nanfan Res Inst Sanya, Sanya 572024, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] UAB, Global Ecol Unit CREAF, CSIC, Catalonia, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[6] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Water Desalinat & Reuse Ctr, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[7] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Geomatics, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yield prediction; Multiple indicators; Machine learning; Optimal lead time; Spatial autocorrelation; CROP YIELD PREDICTION; LEAF-AREA INDEX; WINTER-WHEAT; TIME-SERIES; SOLAR-RADIATION; DATA FUSION; MODIS; MODEL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109057
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The accurate and timely prediction of crop yield at a large scale is important for food security and the development of agricultural policy. An adaptable and robust method for estimating maize yield for the entire territory of China, however, is currently not available. The inherent trade-off between early estimates of yield and the accuracy of yield prediction also remains a confounding issue. To explore these challenges, we employ indicators such as GPP, ET, surface temperature (Ts), LAI, soil properties and maize phenological information with random forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) machine learning approaches to provide maize yield estimates within China. The aims were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy of maize yield prediction obtained from multimodal data analysis using machine-learning; (2) identify the optimal period for estimating yield; and (3) determine the spatial robustness and adaptability of the proposed method. The results can be summarized as: (1) RFR estimated maize yield more accurately than GBDT; (2) Ts was the best single indicator for estimating yield, while the combination of GPP, Ts, ET and LAI proved best when multi-indicators were used (R-2 = 0.77 and rRMSE = 16.15% for the RFR); (3) the prediction accuracy was lower with earlier lead time but remained relatively high within at least 24 days before maturity (R-2 > 0.77 and rRMSE < 16.92%); and (4) combining machine-learning algorithms with multi-indicators demonstrated a capacity to cope with the spatial heterogeneity. Overall, this study provides a reliable reference for managing agricultural production.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Regression Techniques for the Silage Maize Yield Prediction Using Time-Series Images of Landsat 8 OLI
    Aghighi, Hossein
    Azadbakht, Mohsen
    Ashourloo, Davoud
    Shahrabi, Hamid Salehi
    Radiom, Soheil
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 11 (12) : 4563 - 4577
  • [2] Corn crop response under managing different irrigation and salinity levels
    Amer, Kamal H.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (10) : 1553 - 1563
  • [3] A MODEL OF THE TEMPERATURE AND SOLAR-RADIATION EFFECTS ON SPRING WHEAT GROWTH AND YIELD
    AMIR, J
    SINCLAIR, TR
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (1-2) : 47 - 58
  • [4] Growing degree days - Ecosystem indicator for changing diurnal temperatures and their impact on corn growth stages in Kansas
    Anandhi, Aavudai
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 149 - 158
  • [5] Estimating maize biomass and yield over large areas using high spatial and temporal resolution Sentinel-2 like remote sensing data
    Battude, Marjorie
    Al Bitar, Ahmad
    Morin, David
    Cros, Jerome
    Huc, Mireille
    Sicre, Claire Marais
    Le Dantec, Valerie
    Demarez, Valerie
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 184 : 668 - 681
  • [6] Status of accuracy in remotely sensed and in-situ agricultural water productivity estimates: A review
    Blatchford, Megan L.
    Mannaerts, Chris M.
    Zeng, Yijian
    Nouri, Hamideh
    Karimi, Poolad
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 234
  • [7] Yield estimation and forecasting for winter wheat in Hungary using time series of MODIS data
    Bognar, Perter
    Kern, Aniko
    Pasztor, Szilard
    Lichtenberger, Janos
    Koronczay, David
    Ferencz, Csaba
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (11) : 3394 - 3414
  • [8] A survey on multi-output regression
    Borchani, Hanen
    Varando, Gherardo
    Bielza, Concha
    Larranaga, Pedro
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2015, 5 (05) : 216 - 233
  • [9] Integrating satellite and climate data to predict wheat yield in Australia using machine learning approaches
    Cai, Yaping
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Lobell, David
    Potgieter, Andries B.
    Wang, Shaowen
    Peng, Jian
    Xu, Tianfang
    Asseng, Senthold
    Zhang, Yongguang
    You, Liangzhi
    Peng, Bin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 274 : 144 - 159
  • [10] Wheat yield predictions at a county and field scale with deep learning, machine learning, and google earth engine
    Cao, Juan
    Zhang, Zhao
    Luo, Yuchuan
    Zhang, Liangliang
    Zhang, Jing
    Li, Ziyue
    Tao, Fulu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2021, 123