Can we trust automatic sphygmomanometer validations?

被引:5
作者
Turner, Martin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
blood pressure measurement; laboratory accreditation; quality control; sphygmomanometer validation; HYPERTENSION-INTERNATIONAL-PROTOCOL; PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HOMEDICS BPA-300; REVIEWERS; ETHICS; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e1011
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Hypertension is a leading risk factor for mortality. Detecting, treating and monitoring hypertensive patients require accurate blood pressure measurements. Protocols for validation of automatic sphygmomanometers exist, but quality control of validations is limited to peer review of published reports, which has severe limitations. An extensive international measurement framework provides quality assurance, traceability and laboratory accreditation for many measurements that are important to society, including industrial, scientific and trade measurements, medical imaging and medical laboratory testing. An important part of this quality assurance is external accreditation of laboratories that perform testing and calibration to the international standard ISO 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Automatic sphygmomanometer validation is a form of calibration and deserves quality control at least as good as other tests and calibrations that are important to society. It is suggested that laboratories that perform automatic sphygmomanometer validations should participate in the international measurement framework and be externally accredited by accrediting agencies that are members of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. J Hypertens 28:2353-2356 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:2353 / 2356
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 151892007 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
[3]  
*ANSI AAMI, 2002, SP102002 ANSIAAMI
[4]   Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts [J].
Callaham, ML ;
Baxt, WG ;
Waeckerie, JF ;
Wears, RL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :229-231
[5]   Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research [J].
De Vries, Raymond ;
Anderson, Melissa S. ;
Martinson, Brian C. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2006, 1 (01) :43-50
[6]   Problems with the AAMI study of the Homedics BPA-300 recently published by Yarows [J].
Grim, Clarence .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (04) :237-238
[7]   The HoMedics BPA-200 and BPA-300 home blood pressure devices fail the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and cannot be recommended for patient use [J].
Grim, Clarence E. ;
Grim, Carlene M. .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (04) :227-229
[8]   Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results [J].
Hopewell, Sally ;
Loudon, Kirsty ;
Clarke, Mike J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Dickersin, Kay .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01)
[9]   Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up [J].
Horton, R .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2000, 172 (04) :148-149
[10]  
*INT ORG STAND, 2008, 90012008 ISOIEC