A multi-objective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable public transportation network design

被引:24
作者
Gunay, Elif Elcin [1 ,2 ]
Kremer, Gul E. Okudan [1 ]
Zarindast, Atousa [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Sakarya Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkey
关键词
System design; Robust possibilistic programming; Sustainable transit network planning; Diversity in sustainability beliefs; Perceived satisfaction; TRANSIT SERVICE; MEAN-VALUE; SATISFACTION; MODEL; NECESSITY; OPERATION; QUALITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2020.09.007
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
As a critical component of sustainable development, a transportation system should be designed such that it has a positive impact on the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of the served region. In response, this study introduces the concept of passenger dissatisfaction with additional walking and waiting as an indicator of social sustainability and uses the concept while optimizing the transit network for economic, environmental, and social perfectives. Due to a lack of knowledge about the actual value of different passenger dissatisfaction levels and uncertainty in demand, a multi-objective robust possibilistic programming approach (RPP*) is proposed and solved by using an interactive fuzzy programming approach. Different from other robust possibilistic approaches, RPP* optimizes not only the mean of the objective function and chance constraint violations but also the risk value inherited by uncertain parameters through considering the absolute deviation of the objective function. Both the advantage of RPP* versus the deterministic model and its superiority against several robust possibilistic approaches are demonstrated in the numerical studies. Furthermore, the outcomes of the numerical study demonstrate that the transportation network should be designed in a decentralized way as the risk coefficients, i.e., risk-taking attitude, increase. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 129
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach [J].
Amirgholy, Mahyar ;
Shahabi, Mehrdad ;
Gao, H. Oliver .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 103 :261-285
[2]   Robust Transit Network Design with Stochastic Demand Considering Development Density [J].
An, Kun ;
Lo, Hong K. .
21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, 2015, 7 :300-319
[3]   CONSUMER DISSATISFACTION - EFFECT OF DISCONFIRMED EXPECTANCY ON PERCEIVED PRODUCT PERFORMANCE [J].
ANDERSON, RE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1973, 10 (01) :38-44
[4]   A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk [J].
Babazadeh, Reza ;
Razmi, Jafar ;
Pishvaee, Mir Saman ;
Rabbani, Masoud .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 66 :258-277
[5]   Multiobjective Robust Possibilistic Programming Approach to Sustainable Bioethanol Supply Chain Design under Multiple Uncertainties [J].
Bairamzadeh, Samira ;
Pishvaee, Mir Saman ;
Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (01) :237-256
[6]   Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation:: Two field studies [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Hunecke, Marcel ;
Bloebaum, Anke .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (03) :190-203
[7]  
Barth M., 2005, Development of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Modal Emissions and Fuel Consumption Model
[8]   A conceptual framework to formulate transportation network design problem considering social equity criteria [J].
Behbahani, Hamid ;
Nazari, Sobhan ;
Kang, Masood Jafari ;
Litman, Todd .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 125 :171-183
[9]   Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, J. A. Sarsfield .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (06) :478-489
[10]   Market Segmentation Analysis Using Attitudes Toward Transportation Exploring the Differences Between Men and Women [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, Jose Sarsfield .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2067) :56-64