Immune checkpoint blockade for non-small cell lung cancer: What is the role in the special populations?

被引:35
作者
Califano, R. [1 ,2 ]
Gomes, F. [1 ]
Ackermann, C. J. [1 ]
Rafee, S. [1 ]
Tsakonas, G. [3 ]
Ekman, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Med Oncol, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Canc Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Theme Canc, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
NSCLC; Immunotherapy; Elderly; Performance status; Autoimmune disease; Viral infections; HIV; HCV; HBV; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERFORMANCE STATUS; PREEXISTING AUTOIMMUNE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; NIVOLUMAB; DOCETAXEL; INHIBITORS; HEPATITIS; PREVALENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In recent years, nonesmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) entered in a new era of anticancer treatments with the success of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). These are now part of daily practice from locally advanced to metastatic NSCLC. However, the registration phase III trials are highly selective and not fully representative of the patients seen in real-world clinical practice. This is particularly obvious for older and frail patients, which represent the majority of NSCLC cases worldwide. The median age of the patients enrolled in clinical trials is 10 years younger than what is seen in clinic and patients with performance status (PS) similar to 2 were excluded from registration studies. No strong conclusions can be drawn from the available trials where older and frail patients have been excluded. The majority of data on efficacy according to age are derived from underpowered subgroup analysis and there are no age-specific safety data published. Current data suggest that older patients may derive a similar benefit with no increased toxicity when compared with younger patients. However, the recent development of immunotherapychemotherapy combinations and the potential higher incidence of toxicity, raise additional concerns for these populations where adequate patient selection is paramount. CPI is not recommended for patients with PS 3-4 and should be considered with caution for those with PS 2. The evidence for patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID), organ transplant or chronic viral infections (such us viral hepatitis B and C or human immunodeficiency virus) is less clear and low level. Although CPI are potentially safe in selected patients with AID with minimal activity and well-controlled chronic viral infections, patients with solid organ transplant face a significant risk of graft loss and death. Therefore, a decision to treat these groups of patients should always be discussed at a multidisciplinary level. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer in solid organ transplantation recipients: an institutional experience and a systematic review of the literature [J].
Abdel-Wahab, Noha ;
Safa, Houssein ;
Abudayyeh, Ala ;
Johnson, Daniel H. ;
Van Anh Trinh ;
Zobniw, Chrystia M. ;
Lin, Heather ;
Wong, Michael K. ;
Abdelrahim, Maen ;
Gaber, A. Osama ;
Suarez-Almazor, Maria E. ;
Diab, Adi .
JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2019, 7
[2]   Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease A Systematic Review [J].
Abdel-Wahab, Noha ;
Shah, Mohsin ;
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A. ;
Suarez-Almazor, Maria E. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (02) :121-+
[3]   Are clinical trial eligibility criteria an accurate reflection of a real-world population of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients? [J].
Al-Baimani, K. ;
Jonker, H. ;
Zhang, T. ;
Goss, G. D. ;
Laurie, S. A. ;
Nicholas, G. ;
Wheatley-Price, P. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) :E291-E297
[4]  
[Anonymous], ANN ONCOL S8
[5]  
[Anonymous], UK NAT LUNG CANC AUD
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ANN ONCOL S2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CANC INC MORT PREV W
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ONCOLOGIST
[9]  
[Anonymous], ANN ONCOL S8
[10]  
[Anonymous], ANN ONCOL S8