Cross-level interpersonal ties and IJV innovation: Evidence from China

被引:17
作者
Bai, Xuan [1 ]
Wang, Qingtao [1 ]
Sheng, Shibin [2 ]
Li, Julie Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Fac Business Adm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Collat Sch Business, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mkt, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Top-level interpersonal ties; Operating-level interpersonal ties; Knowledge exchange; Knowledge integration; Exploratory innovation; Exploitative innovation; INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MANAGERIAL TIES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MARKET ORIENTATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; POLITICAL TIES; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; RADICAL INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.047
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Drawing on the resource-based view (RBV), this study examines the differing roles of top-level and operatinglevel interpersonal ties between foreign and domestic partners in joint venture innovation. Based on dyadic data collected from top-level and operating-level boundary spanners in 179 international joint ventures (IJVs) (a total of 358 boundary spanners), our results indicate that while top-level interpersonal ties have positive effects on both exploratory and exploitative innovation, operating-level interpersonal ties have a greater positive effect on exploitative innovation than on exploratory innovation. Furthermore, we find that knowledge exchange and knowledge integration mediate the relationship between interpersonal ties and innovation. Specifically, knowledge exchange mediates the relationship between operating-level interpersonal ties and exploitative innovation, whereas knowledge integration mediates the relationship between top-level/operating-level interpersonal ties and exploratory innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 630
页数:13
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Adler P.S., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, J MANAGE STUD
[5]   Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :61-83
[6]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02723327
[7]   How Do International Joint Ventures Build Legitimacy Effectively in Emerging Economies? CSR, Political Ties, or Both? [J].
Bai, Xuan ;
Chang, Jeanine ;
Li, Julie Juan .
MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2019, 59 (03) :387-412
[8]   Contract governance and buyer-supplier conflict: The moderating role of institutions [J].
Bai, Xuan ;
Sheng, Shibin ;
Li, Julie Juan .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 41 :12-24
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]  
Barney J., 1997, GAINING SUSTAINING C