AHP-TOPSIS social sustainability approach for selecting supplier in construction supply chain

被引:60
作者
Marzouk, Mohamed [1 ]
Sabbah, Marwa [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Struct Engn Dept, Giza, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Integrated Engn Design Management Program, Giza, Egypt
来源
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS | 2021年 / 2卷
关键词
Social sustainability; Supplier selection; Construction supply chain; Multi-criteria decision making; Analytical hierarchy process; TOPSIS; Sensitivity analysis; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; RESPONSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Prequalification of suppliers in the Construction Supply Chain is considered a crucial step to assure to their ability to deliver socially sustainable projects. This research identifies the most important social sustainability prequalification criteria for supplier selection in Construction Supply Chain. Additionally, a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model based on social indicators of sustainability is proposed in this research. Structured interviews were organized with experienced practitioners to define the relative importance weights of criteria that have collected in the first phase using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). As such, the AHP is applied to develop mathematical determination to achieve the weights of social indicators. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used to evaluate the different suppliers in the construction supply chain against 17 identified attributes. Ultimately, the closeness coefficients of the suppliers are estimated in order to identify social performance. The research aims at proposing a computational model of MCDM in order to introduce it to the construction organizations to utilize in the supplier prequalification process. A computational model is developed and a case study is worked out to illustrate the proposed methodology in supplier selection to ensure sustainable construction projects. Afterwards, the model is validated and a sensitivity analysis is conducted to analyze the impact of changing the weights of the considered attributes in the model outputs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Accord Bristol., 2005, CONCLUSIONS MINISTER
[2]   Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 124 (01) :252-264
[3]   Indian textile suppliers' sustainability evaluation using the grey approach [J].
Baskaran, Venkatesan ;
Nachiappan, Subramanian ;
Rahman, Shams .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 135 (02) :647-658
[4]  
Chaharsooghi S K, 2014, Int Sch Res Notices, V2014, P434168, DOI 10.1155/2014/434168
[5]   Logistics social responsibility: Standard adoption and practices in Italian companies [J].
Ciliberti, Francesco ;
Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo ;
Scozzi, Barbara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (01) :88-106
[6]   Supply chain management: theory and practice - the emergence of an academic discipline? [J].
Cousins, Paul D. ;
Lawson, Benn ;
Squire, Brian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (07) :697-702
[7]   The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability [J].
Dempsey, Nicola ;
Bramley, Glen ;
Power, Sinead ;
Brown, Caroline .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 19 (05) :289-300
[8]   Designer-buyer-supplier interface: Theory versus practice [J].
Dowlatshahi, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 63 (02) :111-130
[9]   Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance [J].
Esfahbodi, Ali ;
Zhang, Yufeng ;
Watson, Glyn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 :350-366
[10]   ON DERIVING PRIORITY VECTORS FROM MATRICES OF PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
FICHTNER, J .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1986, 20 (06) :341-345