Analysis of a Wing-Fuselage Biplane with Trailing-Edge Flaps in Low-Speed Flow

被引:5
作者
Duong Nguyen, Thai [1 ]
Kashitani, Masashi [1 ]
Kusunose, Kazuhiro [2 ]
Taguchi, Masato [1 ]
Takita, Yoshihiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Acad, Dept Aerosp Engn, 1-10-20 Hashirimizu, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2398686, Japan
[2] Natl Def Acad, 1-10-20 Hashirimizu, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2398686, Japan
[3] Natl Def Acad, Dept Comp Sci, 1-10-20 Hashirimizu, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2398686, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2022年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词
Trailing Edge Flap; Fuselage Configurations; Biplane; Aerodynamic Characteristics; Mean Aerodynamic Chord; Dynamic Pressure; Tapered Wings; Aerodynamic Performance; Wingtip Vortices; Biplane Wings; DESIGN; WAKE; CONFIGURATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.C036154
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a basic wing-fuselage supersonic biplane incorporating trailing-edge flaps are assessed using both wake and balance measurements. The effects of the flap attachment location, flap deflection, and flap length are evaluated. These experiments employed a flow velocity of 20 m/s and a Reynolds number of 1.4x105, along with a model having a simple three-dimensional wing-fuselage supersonic biplane configuration; and wake data were obtained with a five-hole probe. Installing the flap near the wingtip was found to produce strong interactions between the wingtip and the flap vortices in the wake, leading to significant induced drag at the wingtip. The local lift increases not only at the flap attachment location but also over the entire wingspan. Positioning the flaps near the body is determined to be more effective, and it gives rise to higher lift and smaller drag than in the case of installing the flap near the wingtip, due to the effects of the tapered wing configuration. The effects of the flap length and flap deflection are also confirmed, with longer flaps and larger flap deflection giving higher lift and more drag.</p>
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 363
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator Project
[2]   Low-Boom/Low-Drag Design Optimization of Innovative Supersonic Transport Configuration [J].
Ban, Naohiko ;
Yamazaki, Wataru ;
Kusunose, Kazuhiro .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2018, 55 (03) :1071-1081
[3]  
Betz A., 1925, Z FLUGTECHNIK MOTORL, V16
[4]   QUANTITATIVE LOW-SPEED WAKE SURVEYS [J].
BRUNE, GW .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1994, 31 (02) :249-255
[5]  
BUSEMANN A., 1935, AERODYNAMIC LIFT SUP, V12th, P210
[6]   Review of Far-Field Drag Decomposition Methods for Aircraft Design [J].
Fan, Yitong ;
Li, Weipeng .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2019, 56 (01) :11-21
[7]  
Harry L.M., 1977, D8524 NASA TN
[8]   Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Optimization of Supersonic Biplane Airfoils [J].
Hu, Rui ;
Jameson, Antony ;
Wang, Qiqi .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2012, 49 (03) :802-814
[9]   Computational Drag Prediction of the DPW4 Configuration Using the Far-Field Approach [J].
Hue, David ;
Esquieu, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (05) :1658-1670
[10]  
Kashitani M., 2013, 20131022 AIAA, DOI [10.2514/6.2013-1022, DOI 10.2514/6.2013-1022]