Biomechanical effects of cross-pin's diameter in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament - A specific case study via finite element analysis

被引:4
作者
Abidin, Nur Afikah Zainal [1 ,2 ]
Ramlee, Muhammad Hanif [1 ,2 ]
Ab Rashid, Amir Mustakim [1 ,2 ]
Ng, Bing Wui [2 ]
Gan, Hong Seng [3 ]
Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Sch Biomed Engn & Hlth Sci, Bioinspired Devices & Tissue Engn BIOINSPIRA Res G, Johor Baharu 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Hosp Pakar Kanak Kanak, Dept Orthopaed, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaysia Kelantan, Dept Data Sci, Pengkalan Chepa 16100, Kelantan, Malaysia
[4] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Human Ctr Engn iHumEn, Sports Innovat & Technol Ctr SITC, Johor Baharu 81310, Johor, Malaysia
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2022年 / 53卷 / 07期
关键词
FEA; ACL-R; Stability; Diameter of fixator; Biomechanics; Stress-strain; HAMSTRING TENDON GRAFT; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; INTERFERENCE SCREW; FEMORAL FIXATION; EXTERNAL FIXATORS; KNEE CARTILAGE; FRACTURE; STRESS; STABILITY; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.021
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
For anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), one of the crucial aspects of treatment is the fixator selection that could provide initial graft fixation post-operatively. Literature on biomechanical stabilities of different sizes of fixators as femoral graft fixation is limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the influence of different diameters of cross-pins on the stability of graft fixations after ACL-R via finite element analysis (FEA). In the methodology, three-dimensional (3D) models of three different diameters of cross-pins were developed, of which anterior tibial loads (ATL) were applied onto the tibia. From the findings, the cross-pin with a smaller diameter (4 mm) provided optimum stability than larger diameter cross-pins, whereby it demonstrated acceptable stresses at the fixators (both cross-pin and interference screw) with a different percentage of 28%, while the stresses at the corresponding bones were favourable for osseointegration to occur. Besides, the strains of the knee joint with 4 mm diameter cross-pin were also superior in providing a good biomechanical environment for bone healing, while the recorded strain values at fixators were comparable with a larger diameter of cross-pins without being inferior in terms of deformation. To conclude, the cross-pin with 4 mm diameter depicted the best biomechanical aspects in graft fixation for ACL-R since it allows better assistance for the osseointegration process and can minimise the possibility of the breakage and migration of fixators. This study is not only useful for medical surgeons to justify their choices of pin diameter to treat patients, but also for researchers to conduct future studies. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2424 / 2436
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]   Graft fixation influences revision risk after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts: A study of 38,666 patients from the Scandinavian knee ligament registries 2004-2011 [J].
Persson, Andreas ;
Gifstad, Tone ;
Lind, Martin ;
Engebretsen, Lars ;
Fjeldsgaard, Knut ;
Drogset, Jon Olav ;
Forssblad, Magnus ;
Espehaug, Birgitte ;
Kjellsen, Asle B. ;
Fevang, Jonas M. .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2018, 89 (02) :204-210
[42]   Applying Cross-Pin System in Both Femoral and Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendons [J].
Qi, Wei ;
Liu, Yujie ;
Xue, Jing ;
Li, Haifeng ;
Wang, Junliang ;
Qu, Feng .
ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2015, 4 (05) :E397-E402
[43]  
Ramlee Muhammad Hanif, 2018, 2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS), P81, DOI 10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527420
[44]   The effects of additional hollow cylinder coated to external fixator screws for treating pilon fracture: A biomechanical perspective [J].
Ramlee, Muhammad Hanif ;
Seng, Gan Hong ;
Felip, Antonio Ros ;
Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (08) :2131-2141
[45]   Three-Dimensional Modelling and Finite Element Analysis of an Ankle External Fixator [J].
Ramlee, Muhammad Hanif ;
Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul ;
Harun, Habibollah .
MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING RESEARCH ADVANCES 1.1, 2014, 845 :183-188
[46]   Biomechanical evaluation of two commonly used external fixators in the treatment of open subtalar dislocation-A finite element analysis [J].
Ramlee, Muhammad Hanif ;
Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul ;
Murali, Malliga Raman ;
Kamarul, Tunku .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2014, 36 (10) :1358-1366
[47]   Trends in Surgeon Preferences on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Techniques [J].
Samuelsson, Kristian ;
Andersson, Daniel ;
Ahlden, Mattias ;
Fu, Freddie H. ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Karlsson, Jon .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (01) :111-+
[48]   A novel, hydroxyapatite-based screw-like device for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions [J].
Schumacher, Thomas C. ;
Tushtev, Kamen ;
Wagner, Ulrich ;
Becker, Caroline ;
Holthaus, Marzellus Grosse ;
Hein, Sebastian B. ;
Haack, Janne ;
Heiss, Christian ;
Engelhardt, Markus ;
El Khassawna, Thaqif ;
Rezwan, Kurosch .
KNEE, 2017, 24 (05) :933-939
[49]   Biomechanical Comparison of Cross-Pin and Endobutton-CL Femoral Fixation of a Flexor Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Porcine Femur-Graft-Tibia Complex Study [J].
Shen, Hsain-Chung ;
Chang, Jen-Huei ;
Lee, Chian-Her ;
Shen, Pei-Hung ;
Yeh, Tsu-Te ;
Wu, Chia-Chun ;
Kuo, Chun-Lin .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 161 (02) :282-287
[50]   Non-anatomical placement adversely affects the functional performance of the meniscal implant: a finite element study [J].
Shriram, Duraisamy ;
Yamako, Go ;
Kumar, Gideon Praveen ;
Chosa, Etsuo ;
Cui, Fangsen ;
Subburaj, Karupppasamy .
BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2021, 20 (03) :1167-1185