The effect of metal artefact on the design of custom 3D printed acetabular implants

被引:5
作者
Di Laura, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Henckel, Johann [1 ]
Wescott, Robert [2 ]
Hothi, Harry [1 ,2 ]
Hart, Alister J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Brockley Hill, London HA7 4LP, England
[2] UCL, Inst Orthopaed & Musculoskeletal Sci, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Paprosky acetabular classification; Revision hip surgery; Metal artefact; Computed tomography; Custom 3D printed implants; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY; BONE LOSS; 2-STAGE REVISION; CLASSIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; SPACER; REPLACEMENT; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1186/s41205-020-00074-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background3D Printed custom-made implants constitute a viable option in patients with acetabular Paprosky III defects. In these patients, needing complex hip revision surgery, the appreciation of the bony defect is crucial to assure stable fixation of the customised implant, often intended to replace a failed one. We aimed to understand the effect of metal artefact on the design of customised implants.Methods26 patients with massive acetabular defects were referred, between May 2016 and September 2018, to our institution classified as "un-reconstructable" by other hospitals. They all received custom 3D-printed acetabular cups. A subset of them underwent two-stage revision surgery due to infection. We then extended the two-stage procedure to the cases where metal artefacts were significantly affecting the reading of the CT scans.CT scans of patients' pelvises were taken pre and post-implant removal. We assessed for changes in bony shape and volume of the pelvis using 3D imaging software and quantified the effect on implant design with CAD software.ResultsEight (out of 26) patients (31%) underwent two-stage revision surgery. The CT bony reconstructions between the two timepoints changed in all cases. The changes were mostly associated to the shape and distribution of the acetabular defects. Three of these cases (37.5%) showed a remarkable difference in the remaining bone that led to a change in implant design. So far, there has been no difference in the clinical outcome between the patients who underwent single (n=18) and two-stage surgery (n=8).ConclusionsThe shape of the acetabulum reconstructed from CT data is potentially altered by metal artefact and bone excised during removal of the failed component. For "end-of-road" acetabular reconstruction, we recommend surgeons consider the use of two-stage surgery to enable a reliable fitting of the complex shape of 3D-printed implants.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review [J].
Ahmad, Asim Qamar ;
Schwarzkopf, Ran .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 12 :S238-S243
[2]   Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results [J].
Aprato, Alessandro ;
Giachino, Matteo ;
Bedino, Paolo ;
Mellano, Danilo ;
Piana, Raimondo ;
Masse, Alessandro .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (01) :117-122
[3]   Stem Cells Grown in Osteogenic Medium on PLGA, PLGA/HA, and Titanium Scaffolds for Surgical Applications [J].
Asti, Annalia ;
Gastaldi, Giulia ;
Dorati, Rossella ;
Saino, Enrica ;
Conti, Bice ;
Visai, Livia ;
Benazzo, Francesco .
BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 2010
[4]   The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip [J].
Baauw, M. ;
van Hellemondt, G. G. ;
van Hooff, M. L. ;
Spruit, M. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (06) :780-785
[5]   A Custom-made Acetabular Implant for Paprosky Type 3 Defects [J].
Baauw, Marieke ;
van Hellemondt, Gijs Gerard ;
Spruit, Maarten .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (01) :E195-E198
[6]   Adding Value in Additive Manufacturing [J].
Banks, Jim .
IEEE PULSE, 2013, 4 (06) :22-26
[7]   Outcomes of Custom Flange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Predictors of Failure [J].
Barlow, Brian T. ;
Oi, Kathryn K. ;
Lee, Yuo-yu ;
Carli, Alberto V. ;
Choi, Daniel S. ;
Bostrom, Mathias P. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (05) :1057-1064
[8]   The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study [J].
Bayliss, Lee E. ;
Culliford, David ;
Monk, A. Paul ;
Glyn-Jones, Sion ;
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel ;
Judge, Andrew ;
Cooper, Cyrus ;
Carr, Andrew J. ;
Arden, Nigel K. ;
Beard, David J. ;
Price, Andrew J. .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10077) :1424-1430
[9]   REVISION ARTHROPLASTY USING AN ANTI-PROTRUSIO CAGE FOR MASSIVE ACETABULAR BONE DEFICIENCY [J].
BERRY, DJ ;
MULLER, ME .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (05) :711-715
[10]   Two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection using an interim articulated Prostalac hip spacer A 10-TO 15-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY [J].
Biring, G. S. ;
Kostamo, T. ;
Garbuz, D. S. ;
Masri, B. A. ;
Duncan, C. P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (11) :1431-1437