Risk evaluation of rock burst through theory of static and dynamic stresses superposition

被引:80
作者
Li Zhen-lei [1 ,2 ]
Dou Lin-ming [1 ,2 ]
Wang Gui-feng [1 ]
Cai Wu [1 ,2 ]
He Jiang [2 ]
Ding Yan-lu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Resources & Safe Min, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mines, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock burst; hazard; mining; stress; risk evaluation; microseismic monitoring; ROCKBURST; HAZARD; PREVENTION; PREDICTION; ROOF;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-015-2570-2
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Rock burst is one of the most catastrophic dynamic hazards in coal mining. A static and dynamic stresses superposition-based (SDSS-based) risk evaluation method of rock burst was proposed to pre-evaluate rock burst risk. Theoretical basis of this method is the stress criterion incurring rock burst and rock burst risk is evaluated according to the closeness degree of the total stress (due to the superposition of static stress in the coal and dynamic stress induced by tremors) with the critical stress. In addition, risk evaluation criterion of rock burst was established by defining the "Satisfaction Degree" of static stress. Furthermore, the method was used to pre-evaluate rock burst risk degree and prejudge endangered area of an insular longwall face in Nanshan Coal Mine in China. Results show that rock burst risk is moderate at advance extent of 97 m, strong at advance extent of 97-131 m, and extremely strong (i.e. inevitable to occur) when advance extent exceeds 131 m (mining is prohibited in this case). The section of two gateways whose floor abuts 15-3 coal seam is a susceptible area prone to rock burst. Evaluation results were further compared with rock bursts and tremors detected by microseismic monitoring. Comparison results indicate that evaluation results are consistent with microseismic monitoring, which proves the method's feasibility.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 683
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction [J].
Adoko, Amoussou Coffi ;
Gokceoglu, Candan ;
Wu, Li ;
Zuo, Qing Jun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2013, 61 :86-95
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MINE PRESSURE GROUND
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROCED ENG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J MINING AMP SAFETY
[5]  
Cao AY, 2011, PROCEDIA ENG, V26, P1253
[6]  
Cao AY, 2009, Min. Sci. Technol, V19, P718, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60131-9
[7]   3-D modeling of rock burst in pillar No. 19 of Fetr6 chromite mine [J].
Dehghan, S. ;
Shahriar, K. ;
Maarefvand, P. ;
Goshtasbi, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) :231-236
[8]   Influence of the stress state in a coal bump-prone deep coalbed: A case study [J].
Diaz Aguado, Maria B. ;
Gonzalez, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2009, 46 (02) :333-345
[9]  
DOU Lin-ming, 2001, THEORY TECHNOLOGY RO, V6-11, P25
[10]  
DOU Lin-ming, 2006, PREVENTION CONTROL R, V4/5, P32