Evaluating Psychosocial Mechanisms Underlying STEM Persistence in Undergraduates: Evidence of Impact from a Six-Day Pre-College Engagement STEM Academy Program

被引:39
作者
Findley-Van Nostrand, Danielle [1 ]
Pollenz, Richard S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Cell Biol Microbiol & Mol Biol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
SELF-EFFICACY; RESEARCH EXPERIENCES; CAREER CHOICES; STUDENTS; SCIENCE; SENSE; PARTICIPATION; IDENTITY; MOTIVATION; ENRICHMENT;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.16-10-0294
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The persistence of undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines is a national issue based on STEM workforce projections. We implemented a weeklong pre-college engagement STEM Academy (SA) program aimed at addressing several areas related to STEM retention. We validated an instrument that was developed based on existing, validated measures and examined several psychosocial constructs related to STEM (science identity, self-efficacy, sense of belonging to the university and to STEM, career expectancies, and intention to leave STEM majors) before and after the program. We also compared students in the SA program with a matched comparison group of first-year students. Results show that SA students significantly increased in science identity and sense of belonging to STEM and to the university, all predictive of increased STEM retention and a primary aim of the program. Relative to the matched comparison group, SA students began their first semester with higher STEM self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity, positive career expectancies, and lower intention to leave STEM. The SA cohort showed 98% first-year retention and 92% STEM major retention. The SA program serves as a model of a scalable, first-level, cocurricular engagement experience to enhance psychosocial factors that impact undergraduate persistence in STEM.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
American Association for the Advancement in Science, 2011, VIS CHANG UND BIOL E
[2]  
American Association of University Women, 2010, WHY SO FEW WOMEN SCI
[3]  
Anderman L.H., 2004, Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley, V13, P27, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0749-7423, 10.1016/s0749-7423(03)13002-6, DOI 10.1016/S0749-7423(03)13002-6]
[4]   Is Science Me? High School Students' Identities, Participation and Aspirations in Science, Engineering, and Medicine [J].
Aschbacher, Pamela R. ;
Li, Erika ;
Roth, Ellen J. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2010, 47 (05) :564-582
[5]   Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report [J].
Auchincloss, Lisa Corwin ;
Laursen, Sandra L. ;
Branchaw, Janet L. ;
Eagan, Kevin ;
Graham, Mark ;
Hanauer, David I. ;
Lawrie, Gwendolyn ;
McLinn, Colleen M. ;
Pelaez, Nancy ;
Rowland, Susan ;
Towns, Marcy ;
Trautmann, Nancy M. ;
Varma-Nelson, Pratibha ;
Weston, Timothy J. ;
Dolan, Erin L. .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (01) :29-40
[6]   THE EXPLANATORY AND PREDICTIVE SCOPE OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :359-373
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[8]  
Bandura Albert, 1999, Self-efficacy, V13, P158, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
[9]  
Brickhouse NW, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P441, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-3