Similarity in spatial structure constrains ecosystem relationships: Building a macroscale understanding of lakes

被引:27
作者
Lapierre, Jean-Francois [1 ,2 ]
Collins, Sarah M. [3 ]
Seekell, David A. [4 ,5 ]
Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence [6 ,7 ]
Tan, Pang-Ning [8 ]
Skaff, Nicholas K. [6 ]
Taranu, Zofia E. [9 ]
Fergus, C. Emi [10 ]
Soranno, Patricia A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, Pavillon Marie Victorin,CP 6128, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Grp Rech Interuniv Limnol & Environm, Aquat GRIL, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, Umea, Sweden
[5] Umea Univ, Climate Impacts Res Ctr, Abisko, Sweden
[6] Michigan State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Lyman Briggs Coll, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[8] Michigan State Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[9] Univ Ottawa, Dept Biol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] US EPA, Natl Res Council, Corvallis, OR USA
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2018年 / 27卷 / 10期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
climate; ecosystem; lake; landscape; macroscales; Moran eigenvector maps; spatial autocorrelation; spatial scale; spatial structure; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; WATER-QUALITY; SCALE; PATTERNS; CARBON; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12781
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim We aimed to measure the dominant spatial patterns in ecosystem properties (such as nutrients and measures of primary production) and the multi-scaled geographical driver variables of these properties and to quantify how the spatial structure of pattern in all of these variables influences the strength of relationships among them. Location and time period Major taxa studied We studied > 8,500 lakes in a 1.8 million km(2) area of Northeast U.S.A. Data comprised 10-year medians (2002-2011) for measured ecosystem properties, long-term climate averages and recent land use/land cover variables. We focused on ecosystem properties at the base of aquatic food webs, including concentrations of nutrients and algal pigments that are proxies of primary productivity. Methods Results We quantified spatial structure in ecosystem properties and their geographical driver variables using distance-based Moran eigenvector maps (dbMEMs). We then compared the similarity in spatial structure for all pairs of variables with the correlation between variables to illustrate how spatial structure constrains relationships among ecosystem properties. The strength of spatial structure decreased in order for climate, land cover/use, lake ecosystem properties and lake and landscape morphometry. Having a comparable spatial structure is a necessary condition to observe a strong relationship between a pair of variables, but not a sufficient one; variables with very different spatial structure are never strongly correlated. Lake ecosystem properties tended to have an intermediary spatial structure compared with that of their main drivers, probably because climate and landscape variables with known ecological links induce spatial patterns. Main conclusion Our empirical results describe inherent spatial constraints that dictate the expected relationships between ecosystem properties and their geographical drivers at macroscales. Our results also suggest that understanding the spatial scales at which ecological processes operate is necessary to predict the effects of multi-scaled environmental changes on ecosystem properties.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1263
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1986, A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems
  • [2] Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics
    Anselin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (03) : 705 - 710
  • [3] Forward selection of explanatory variables
    Blanchet, F. Guillaume
    Legendre, Pierre
    Borcard, Daniel
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (09) : 2623 - 2632
  • [4] The volume and mean depth of Earth's lakes
    Cael, B. B.
    Heathcote, A. J.
    Seekell, D. A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (01) : 209 - 218
  • [5] The size-distribution of Earth's lakes
    Cael, B. B.
    Seekell, D. A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [6] Grouping lakes for water quality assessment and monitoring: The roles of regionalization and spatial scale
    Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence
    Soranno, Patricia A.
    Bremigan, Mary T.
    Wagner, Tyler
    Martin, Sherry L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 41 (03) : 425 - 440
  • [7] Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative
    Clark, JS
    Carpenter, SR
    Barber, M
    Collins, S
    Dobson, A
    Foley, JA
    Lodge, DM
    Pascual, M
    Pielke, R
    Pizer, W
    Pringle, C
    Reid, WV
    Rose, KA
    Sala, O
    Schlesinger, WH
    Wall, DH
    Wear, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5530) : 657 - 660
  • [8] Spatial scale modulates the strength of ecological processes driving disease distributions
    Cohen, Jeremy M.
    Civitello, David J.
    Brace, Amber J.
    Feichtinger, Erin M.
    Ortega, C. Nicole
    Richardson, Jason C.
    Sauer, Erin L.
    Liu, Xuan
    Rohr, Jason R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (24) : E3359 - E3364
  • [9] Lake nutrient stoichiometry is less predictable than nutrient concentrations at regional and sub-continental scales
    Collins, Sarah M.
    Oliver, Samantha K.
    Lapierre, Jean-Francois
    Stanley, Emily H.
    Jones, John R.
    Wagner, Tyler
    Soranno, Patricia A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (05) : 1529 - 1540
  • [10] The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments
    Downing, J. A.
    Prairie, Y. T.
    Cole, J. J.
    Duarte, C. M.
    Tranvik, L. J.
    Striegl, R. G.
    McDowell, W. H.
    Kortelainen, P.
    Caraco, N. F.
    Melack, J. M.
    Middelburg, J. J.
    [J]. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2006, 51 (05) : 2388 - 2397