Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

被引:16
作者
Comiter, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER; LEAK POINT PRESSURE; PERFUSION SPHINCTEROMETRY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; SLING SUSPENSION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/nrurol.2014.346
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Surgery remains the most effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Over the past two decades, this surgery has evolved with respect to both operative technique and sling design, and various devices are now available that have different mechanisms of action, such as the artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling. The choice of device, however, should be individualized according to the circumstances of each patient. The optimal surgical treatment depends on a variety of patient-related factors, including the degree of urine leakage as assessed by incontinence pad weight test results, bladder contractility, urethral compliance, history of radiation exposure or prior incontinence surgery, and patient preference-given the choice, most patients opt for a sling procedure over an artificial sphincter to avoid implantation of a mechanical device. Athorough urodynamic evaluation is, therefore, necessary for the majority of patients. An artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling might be the most appropriate choice for a particular patient, depending on their specific urodynamic findings. Progress in this field continues, and several new devices are in development.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [61] Treatment of Postprostatectomy Male Urinary Incontinence With the Transobturator Retroluminal Repositioning Sling Suspension: 3-Year Follow-up
    Rehder, Peter
    Haab, Francois
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Gozzi, Christian
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) : 140 - 145
  • [62] The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence
    Rehder, Peter
    Mitterberger, Michael J.
    Pichler, Renate
    Kerschbaumer, Andrea
    Glodny, Bernhard
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (11) : 1668 - 1671
  • [63] Rehder Peter, 2009, Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, V62, P860
  • [64] A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes
    Rocha, Flavio Trigo
    Gomes, Cristiano Mendes
    Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
    Arap, Sam
    Sroug, Miguel
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [65] Romano SV, 2009, ACTAS UROL ESP, V33, P309
  • [66] Absorbable versus nonabsorbable graft: Outcome of bone anchored male sling for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence
    Samli, M
    Singla, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (02) : 499 - 502
  • [67] The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence
    Schaeffer, AJ
    Clemens, JQ
    Ferrari, M
    Stamey, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05) : 1510 - 1515
  • [68] Treatment of Post-prostate Surgery Urinary Incontinence With the Periurethral Constrictor: A Retrospective Analysis
    Schiavini, Joao Luiz
    Damiao, Ronaldo
    Dutra de Resende Junior, Jose Anacleto
    Dornas, Maria Cristina
    Cruz Lima da Costa, Danilo Souza
    Barros, Cesar Borges
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (06) : 1488 - 1492
  • [69] Soave A, 2014, UROLOGE, V53, P346, DOI 10.1007/s00120-013-3352-9
  • [70] Risk factors of treatment failure after retrourethral transobturator male sling
    Soljanik, Irina
    Gozzi, Christian
    Becker, Armin J.
    Stief, Christian G.
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 201 - 206