Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

被引:16
作者
Comiter, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER; LEAK POINT PRESSURE; PERFUSION SPHINCTEROMETRY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; SLING SUSPENSION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/nrurol.2014.346
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Surgery remains the most effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Over the past two decades, this surgery has evolved with respect to both operative technique and sling design, and various devices are now available that have different mechanisms of action, such as the artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling. The choice of device, however, should be individualized according to the circumstances of each patient. The optimal surgical treatment depends on a variety of patient-related factors, including the degree of urine leakage as assessed by incontinence pad weight test results, bladder contractility, urethral compliance, history of radiation exposure or prior incontinence surgery, and patient preference-given the choice, most patients opt for a sling procedure over an artificial sphincter to avoid implantation of a mechanical device. Athorough urodynamic evaluation is, therefore, necessary for the majority of patients. An artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling might be the most appropriate choice for a particular patient, depending on their specific urodynamic findings. Progress in this field continues, and several new devices are in development.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [41] Cancer statistics, 2007
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Murray, Taylor
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (01) : 43 - 66
  • [42] Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy
    Kao, TC
    Cruess, DF
    Garner, D
    Foley, J
    Seay, T
    Friedrichs, P
    Thrasher, JB
    Mooneyhan, RD
    McLeod, DG
    Moul, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) : 858 - 864
  • [43] Trends in the Use of Incontinence Procedures After Radical Prostatectomy: A Population Based Analysis
    Kim, Philip H.
    Pinheiro, Laura C.
    Atoria, Coral L.
    Eastham, James A.
    Sandhut, Jaspreet S.
    Elkin, Elena B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 602 - 608
  • [44] Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: A 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan
    Kim, Simon P.
    Sarmast, Zubair
    Daignault, Stephanie
    Faerber, Gary J.
    McGuire, Edward J.
    Latini, Jerilyn M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05) : 1912 - 1916
  • [45] A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: Preliminary clinical results
    Knight, Sarah L.
    Susser, Judith
    Greenwell, Tamsin
    Mundy, Anthony R.
    Craggs, Michael D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (03) : 574 - 580
  • [46] Artificial Urinary Sphincter Versus Male Sling for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence-What Do Patients Choose?
    Kumar, Angelish
    Litt, Elana Rosenberg
    Ballert, Katie N.
    Nitti, Victor W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (03) : 1231 - 1235
  • [47] Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies
    Kundu, SD
    Roehl, KA
    Eggener, SE
    Antenor, JAV
    Han, M
    Catalona, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) : 2227 - 2231
  • [48] 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine
    Lai, H. Henry
    Hsu, Elias I.
    Teh, Bin S.
    Butler, E. Brian
    Boone, Timothy B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (03) : 1021 - 1025
  • [49] Urodynamic Testing in Evaluation of Postradical Prostatectomy Incontinence Before Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation
    Lai, H. Henry
    Hsu, Elias I.
    Boone, Timothy B.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (06) : 1264 - 1269
  • [50] Outcomes Following Artificial Sphincter Implantation After Prior Unsuccessful Male Sling
    Lentz, Aaron C.
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    Webster, George D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (06) : 2149 - 2153