Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

被引:16
作者
Comiter, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER; LEAK POINT PRESSURE; PERFUSION SPHINCTEROMETRY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; SLING SUSPENSION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/nrurol.2014.346
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Surgery remains the most effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Over the past two decades, this surgery has evolved with respect to both operative technique and sling design, and various devices are now available that have different mechanisms of action, such as the artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling. The choice of device, however, should be individualized according to the circumstances of each patient. The optimal surgical treatment depends on a variety of patient-related factors, including the degree of urine leakage as assessed by incontinence pad weight test results, bladder contractility, urethral compliance, history of radiation exposure or prior incontinence surgery, and patient preference-given the choice, most patients opt for a sling procedure over an artificial sphincter to avoid implantation of a mechanical device. Athorough urodynamic evaluation is, therefore, necessary for the majority of patients. An artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling might be the most appropriate choice for a particular patient, depending on their specific urodynamic findings. Progress in this field continues, and several new devices are in development.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Salvage therapy with artificial urinary sphincter after Advance™ male sling failure for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A first clinical experience
    Abdou, A.
    Cornu, J. -N.
    Sebe, P.
    Ciofu, C.
    Peyrat, L.
    Cussenot, O.
    Haab, F.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2012, 22 (11): : 650 - 656
  • [2] Al Afraa T, 2011, CAN J UROL, V18, P5695
  • [3] Management of recurrent post-prostatectomy incontinence after previous failed retrourethral male slings
    Al-Najar, Amr
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Boy, Soenke
    Naumann, Carsten Maik
    Juenemann, Peter-Klaus
    van der Horst, Christof
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (02): : 107 - 111
  • [4] [Anonymous], P 41 ANN M INT CONT
  • [5] [Anonymous], BRAZ J UROL
  • [6] [Anonymous], CAMPBELLS UROLOGY
  • [7] Perfusion sphincterometry for objective evaluation of postprostatectomy intrinsic sphincter deficiency
    Bamshad, BR
    Hadley, HR
    Ruckle, HC
    Lui, PD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (05) : 968 - 973
  • [8] Impact of the 'Repositioning Test' on Postoperative Outcome of Retroluminar Transobturator Male Sling Implantation
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    Gozzi, Christian
    Roosen, Alexander
    Khoder, Wael
    Trottmann, Matthias
    Waidelich, Raphaela
    Stief, Christian G.
    Soljanik, Irina
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (03) : 334 - 338
  • [9] Bauer RM, 2011, BJU INT, V108, P94, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09729.x
  • [10] Complications of the AdVance Transobturator Male Sling in the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    Mayer, Margit E.
    May, Florian
    Gratzke, Christian
    Buchner, Alexander
    Soljanik, Irina
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Stief, Christian G.
    Gozzi, Christian
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (06) : 1494 - 1498