Exploring methods for predicting multiple pressures on ecosystem recovery: A case study on marine eutrophication and fisheries

被引:35
作者
Uusitalo, Laura [1 ]
Korpinen, Samuli [1 ]
Andersen, Jesper H. [2 ]
Niiranen, Susa [3 ]
Valanko, Sebastian [4 ]
Heiskanen, Anna-Stiina [1 ]
Dickey-Collas, Mark [5 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Ctr Marine Res, Helsinki, Finland
[2] NIVA Denmark Water Res, Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Univ Stockholm, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Int Council Explorat Sea, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Tech Univ Denmark, Aqua Natl Inst Aquat Resources, Int Council Explorat Sea, Roskilde, Denmark
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Cumulative effects; Fishing; Management; Modelling; Nutrient input; Pressures; BALTIC SEA; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HUMAN IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; INDICATORS; CHALLENGES; REVEAL; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.csr.2015.11.002
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Efforts to attain good environmental status in the marine realm require decisions which cannot be done without knowledge of effects of different management measures. Given the wide diversity of marine ecosystems, multitude of pressures affecting it and the still poor understanding on linkages between those, there are likely no models available to give all the required answers. Hence, several separate approaches can be used in parallel to give support for management measures. We tested three completely different methods - a spatial impact index, a food web model and a Bayesian expert method. We found that a large uncertainty existed regarding the ecosystem response to the management scenarios, and that the three different modelling approaches complemented each other. The models indicated that in order to reach an improved overall state of the ecosystem nutrient reductions are the more effective of the two management variables explored, and that cumulative effects of the management of nutrient inputs and fishing mortality are likely to exist. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 60
页数:13
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Integrated assessment of marine biodiversity status using a prototype indicator-based assessment tool [J].
Andersen, Jesper H. ;
Dahl, Karsten ;
Goke, Cordula ;
Hartvig, Martin ;
Murray, Ciaran ;
Rindorf, Anna ;
Skov, Henrik ;
Vinther, Morten ;
Korpinen, Samuli .
FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 1
[2]   Baltic Sea biodiversity status vs. cumulative human pressures [J].
Andersen, Jesper H. ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Korpinen, Samuli ;
Murray, Ciaran ;
Reker, Johnny .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2015, 161 :88-92
[3]  
[Anonymous], REP BALT FISH ASS WO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EC HLTH BALT SEA 200
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Balt. Sea Environ. Proc
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan adopted by the HELCOM Ministerial meeting, Krakow, Poland 15th November 2007
[7]   Cumulative impact mapping: Advances, relevance and limitations to marine management and conservation, using Canada's Pacific waters as a case study [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Alidina, Hussein M. ;
Ardron, Jeff A. .
MARINE POLICY, 2010, 34 (05) :876-886
[8]   Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Saloranta, T. ;
Moe, S. J. ;
Eggestad, H. O. ;
Kuikka, S. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (01) :91-104
[9]   Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management [J].
Barton, David N. ;
Kuikka, Sakari ;
Varis, Olli ;
Uusitalo, Laura ;
Henriksen, Hans Jorgen ;
Borsuk, Mark ;
de la Hera, Africa ;
Farmani, Raziyeh ;
Johnson, Sandra ;
Linnell, John D. C. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (03) :418-429
[10]   Grand challenges in marine ecosystems ecology [J].
Borja, Angel .
FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 1