Depersonalization of Business in Ancient Rome

被引:16
|
作者
Abatino, Barbara [1 ]
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe [1 ]
Perotti, Enrico C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
depersonalization; limited liability; entity shielding; Roman law; slave; COMMON-LAW; LIMITED-LIABILITY; LEGAL; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1093/ojls/gqr001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A crucial step in economic development is the depersonalization of business, which enables an enterprise to operate as a separate entity from its owners and managers. Until the emergence of a de iure depersonalization of business in the 19th century, business activities were eminently personal, with managing partners bearing unlimited liability. Roman law even restricted agency. Yet, the Roman legal system developed a form of de facto depersonalized business entity, where depersonalization was achieved by making the fulcrum of the business a non-person: the slave. Although radically different from a legal perspective, this format exhibited all the distinctive features of modern corporations, thereby providing for a functional equivalent of the modern corporate form. The development of the de iure format was hindered by strong cultural, technological and institutional constraints. In contrast, slave-run businesses exhibited features that were largely compatible with these constraints and emerged along the path of least resistance to legal change. The end of slavery and the fall of the Roman Empire closed off this alternative path of legal evolution; consequently, the modern corporate form could only appear once these constraints had been overcome.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 389
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Somatoform Dissociation in Depersonalization Disorder
    Simeon, Daphne
    Smith, Rebecca J.
    Knutelska, Margaret
    Smith, Lisa M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & DISSOCIATION, 2008, 9 (03) : 335 - 348
  • [32] Mindfulness and Depersonalization: a Nuanced Relationship
    Levin, Kaitlin K.
    Gornish, Akiva
    Quigley, Leanne
    MINDFULNESS, 2022, 13 (06) : 1479 - 1489
  • [33] Depersonalization in Patients With Persecutory Delusions
    Cernis, Emma
    Dunn, Graham
    Startup, Helen
    Kingdon, David
    Wingham, Gail
    Pugh, Katherine
    Cordwell, Jacinta
    Mander, Helen
    Freeman, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2014, 202 (10) : 752 - 758
  • [34] Depersonalization, mindfulness, and childhood trauma
    Michal, Matthias
    Beutel, Manfred E.
    Jordan, Jochen
    Zimmermann, Michael
    Wolters, Susanne
    Heidenreich, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2007, 195 (08) : 693 - 696
  • [35] DEPERSONALIZATION AFTER MARIJUANA SMOKING
    MATHEW, RJ
    WILSON, WH
    HUMPHREYS, D
    LOWE, JV
    WEITHE, KE
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 33 (06) : 431 - 441
  • [36] Mindfulness and Depersonalization: a Nuanced Relationship
    Kaitlin K. Levin
    Akiva Gornish
    Leanne Quigley
    Mindfulness, 2022, 13 : 1479 - 1489
  • [37] Episodic depersonalization in focal epilepsy
    Dietl, T
    Bien, C
    Urbach, H
    Elger, C
    Kurthen, M
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 7 (02) : 311 - 315
  • [38] Bosco and the depersonalization, or the pulse of a phantasm
    Skriabine, Joelle
    ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2015, 173 (04): : 308 - 312
  • [39] The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale - Situational (CDS-S) for Measuring Situation-Related Experiences of Depersonalization
    Schweden, Tabea L. K.
    Konrad, Annika C.
    Hoyer, Juergen
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2019, 65 (04): : 243 - 252
  • [40] DEPRESSIVE PHENOMENOLOGY IN REGARD TO DEPERSONALIZATION LEVEL
    Zikic, Olivera
    Ciric, Snezana
    Mitkovic, Marija
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2009, 21 (03) : 320 - 326