Depersonalization of Business in Ancient Rome

被引:16
作者
Abatino, Barbara [1 ]
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe [1 ]
Perotti, Enrico C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
depersonalization; limited liability; entity shielding; Roman law; slave; COMMON-LAW; LIMITED-LIABILITY; LEGAL; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1093/ojls/gqr001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A crucial step in economic development is the depersonalization of business, which enables an enterprise to operate as a separate entity from its owners and managers. Until the emergence of a de iure depersonalization of business in the 19th century, business activities were eminently personal, with managing partners bearing unlimited liability. Roman law even restricted agency. Yet, the Roman legal system developed a form of de facto depersonalized business entity, where depersonalization was achieved by making the fulcrum of the business a non-person: the slave. Although radically different from a legal perspective, this format exhibited all the distinctive features of modern corporations, thereby providing for a functional equivalent of the modern corporate form. The development of the de iure format was hindered by strong cultural, technological and institutional constraints. In contrast, slave-run businesses exhibited features that were largely compatible with these constraints and emerged along the path of least resistance to legal change. The end of slavery and the fall of the Roman Empire closed off this alternative path of legal evolution; consequently, the modern corporate form could only appear once these constraints had been overcome.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 389
页数:25
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]  
Albertario E, 1933, STUDI DIRITTO ROMANO, V1, P157
[2]  
Amirante L, 1983, STUDI ONORE CESARE S, V3, P3
[3]   THOUGHTS OF SOME BRITISH ECONOMISTS ON EARLY LIMITED-LIABILITY AND CORPORATE LEGISLATION [J].
AMSLER, CE ;
BARTLETT, RL ;
BOLTON, CJ .
HISTORY OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1981, 13 (04) :774-793
[4]  
Anderson G.M., 1983, International Review of Law and Economics, V3, P107
[5]  
Andreau J, 2001, BANQUE AFFAIRES MOND, P131
[6]  
Andreau J, 2009, FIDES HUMANITAS IUS, V9, P65
[7]  
Andreau J, 2004, MENTALITES CHOIX EC, P111
[8]  
Andreau J., 1999, Banking and Business in the Roman World
[9]  
Andreau J, 1999, TOPOI, V9, P47
[10]  
[Anonymous], ORIGINS LAW EC ESSAY