Cyclic tests of all-steel web-restrained buckling-restrained brace subassemblages

被引:46
作者
Judd, Johnn P. [1 ]
Marinovic, Igor [2 ]
Eatherton, Matthew R. [3 ]
Hyder, Clifton [2 ]
Phillips, Adam R. [3 ]
Tola, Adrian Tola [3 ]
Charney, Finley A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Arch Engn, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] BlueScope Bldg North Amer Inc, 3200 Players Club Circle, Memphis, TN 38125 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
关键词
Buckling-restrained brace; Cyclic qualification testing; Subassemblage test; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.06.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, cyclic tests of a buckling-restrained brace (BRB) subassemblage with an all-steel web -restrained brace (WRB) were conducted to investigate hysteretic behavior under combined axial and rotational demands. Four full-scale WRB frame subassemblages were subjected to the quasi-static displacement protocol used for BRB qualification described in the AISC 341-10 Seismic Provisions for Steel Buildings. Three different sizes of steel core plates were examined. One specimen used a nominal 7.9-mm thick by 152-mm wide plate, two WRB specimens used a nominal 12.7-mm thick by 152-mm wide plate, and one specimen used a nominal 12.7-mm thick by 229-mm wide plate. All specimens successfully completed the cyclic testing up to 2% story drift without experiencing brace instability, brace end connection failure, or rupture. Specimens with a 12.7-mm thick core plate survived additional cycles at 1.5% story drift before rupture. The test results also showed that the maximum compression forces were less than 1.3 times the maximum tension forces for each cycle corresponding to a deformation greater than the yield displacement, demonstrating that compression overstrength of the WRB was comparable with typical BRBs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 172
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AISC, 2010, 34110 ANSIAISC
[2]  
AISC/SEAOC, 2001, Recommended Provisions for Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames
[3]  
[Anonymous], 35810 AISC ANSI
[4]   Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength [J].
Ariyaratana, Christopher ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2011, 33 (01) :77-89
[5]  
ASCE, 2010, ASCE/SEI 7-16, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784414248
[6]  
ASTM International (ASTM), 2009, E8 ASTM INT
[7]  
Chou CC, 2009, STESSA 2009 - BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, P945
[8]   Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Sheng-Yang .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (08) :2108-2121
[9]  
Clark P., 1999, 68 ANN CONV STRUCT E
[10]   Field Testing of All-Steel Buckling-Restrained Braces Applied to a Damaged Reinforced Concrete Building [J].
Della Corte, Gaetano ;
D'Aniello, Mario ;
Landolfo, Raffaele .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (01)