Towards a High-Fidelity Assessment of Urban Green Spaces Walking Accessibility

被引:7
作者
Blecic, Ivan [1 ]
Saiu, Valeria [1 ]
Trunfio, Giuseppe A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Architecture, I-09129 Cagliari, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Dept Architecture Design & Urbanism, I-07041 Alghero, Italy
来源
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, ICCSA 2020, PART IV | 2020年 / 12252卷
关键词
Urban Public Green Spaces; Accessibility; Walkability; Evaluation model; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; LAND-COVER; QUALITY; PARKS; CLASSIFICATION; PROXIMITY; NETWORK; CITIES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_39
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Urban Public Green Spaces (UPGS) available at walking distance are a vital component of urban quality of life, of citizens' health, and ultimately of the right to the city. Their demand has suddenly become even more ostensive due to the measures of "social distancing" and the restrictions of movement imposed in many countries during the COVID-19 outbreak, showing the importance of the public urban parks and green open spaces located near homes and accessible by foot. Hence, the idea of "green self-sufficiency" at the local, neighbourhood and sub-neighbourhood level has emerged as a relevant objective to pursue. For this purpose, we have constructed a high-fidelity evaluation model to assess the walking accessibility of UPGS at the highly granular spatial scale of street network nodes. The evaluation procedure is based on a novel index constructed around the concept of distance-cumulative deficit, scoring nodes with respect to all the available UPGS within their catchment area of slope-corrected walking distance of 2 km. To showcase the possible outputs of the evaluation procedure and their exploratory analyses, we present an application on the city of Cagliari, Italy. In doing that, we argue that the proposed evaluation approach is an advancement over the traditional (density-based) approaches of assessment of green area availability, and that it provides an intuitive, flexible and extendable tool useful to better evaluate and understand the current and the potential accessibility of urban green space, and to support urban planning, policy making and design.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 549
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Assessing Spatial Equity and Accessibility of Public Green Spaces in Aleppo City, Syria [J].
Almohamad, Hussein ;
Knaack, Anna Lisa ;
Habib, Badriah Mohammed .
FORESTS, 2018, 9 (11)
[2]   Quality assessment of the contributed land use information from OpenStreetMap versus authoritative datasets [J].
Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal ;
Mooney, Peter ;
Zipf, Alexander ;
Schauss, Anne .
Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 2015, 0 (9783319142791) :37-58
[3]   Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree? [J].
Artmann, Martina ;
Inostroza, Luis ;
Fan, Peilei .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 96 :3-9
[4]  
Beirevant A., 2013, International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, V1, P321
[5]  
Breuste J., 2015, ECOL PROCESS, V4, P2015, DOI DOI 10.1186/s13717-014-0027-4
[6]  
Byrne J., 2010, GREEN OPEN SPACE PLA
[7]   Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups [J].
Comber, Alexis ;
Brunsdon, Chris ;
Green, Edmund .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 86 (01) :103-114
[8]  
Cvejic R., 2015, D31 GREEN SURGE PROJ
[9]  
Daniel P., 2018, Radical Statistics, V121, P26
[10]   Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area (VFCA) method [J].
Dony, Coline C. ;
Delmelle, Eric M. ;
Delmelle, Elizabeth C. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 143 :90-99